Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
POLL: Would you play D&D without a Skill System?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Jackelope King" data-source="post: 3859347" data-attributes="member: 31454"><p>It's a difference in gaming philosophy, which is what I was trying to illustrate.</p><p></p><p>In my mind, most of the fun does indeed take place at the table. Philotomy Jurament and I had a discussion about this recently, and the conclusion we reached is basically that there's a difference in how invested a player is in his/her character. If a character is merely a vehicle by which the player gets to take a trip into the wierd and wonderful, one which is little more than 6 stats on a character sheet and a hit point total, then yes, the style of play you describe makes sense to me. It doesn't, however, appeal to me.</p><p></p><p>For me, a character is a unique entity through which the player experiences the wierd and wonderful, and the ways in which that character interacts with the wierd and wonderful (and even the mundane) is part of the appeal. The character's abilities and personality serve to inform the player's decisions and actions, and through the actions which the character takes, the players are able to experience the growth and development (or decline and regression, in some cases <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f609.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=";)" title="Wink ;)" data-smilie="2"data-shortname=";)" /> ) of that character. Sure, we'll tell stories about that time that Shump the half-orc barbarian chopped someone in half once or twice, but we <em>all</em> remember the time that the big, dumb Shump decided to moon the bandits as the heroes escaped over the lake, only to take a heavy crossbow bolt to the butt. Or the memorable time in a supers game that the psychic ninja was introduced to Seinfeld, and questioned whether she should laugh at Kramer because, "That man has ammusing hair."</p><p></p><p>It's entirely a matter of playstyle. But for me, the more chances I have to make the character described on the character sheet in front of me interact with the world the GM is describing in the way that I envision that character interacting with it (for better or for worse), the happier I am. And when I can take my character home to level up or to spend a few more points that I earned, I essentially get to take the game home with me. And that's pretty darn sweet.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Jackelope King, post: 3859347, member: 31454"] It's a difference in gaming philosophy, which is what I was trying to illustrate. In my mind, most of the fun does indeed take place at the table. Philotomy Jurament and I had a discussion about this recently, and the conclusion we reached is basically that there's a difference in how invested a player is in his/her character. If a character is merely a vehicle by which the player gets to take a trip into the wierd and wonderful, one which is little more than 6 stats on a character sheet and a hit point total, then yes, the style of play you describe makes sense to me. It doesn't, however, appeal to me. For me, a character is a unique entity through which the player experiences the wierd and wonderful, and the ways in which that character interacts with the wierd and wonderful (and even the mundane) is part of the appeal. The character's abilities and personality serve to inform the player's decisions and actions, and through the actions which the character takes, the players are able to experience the growth and development (or decline and regression, in some cases ;) ) of that character. Sure, we'll tell stories about that time that Shump the half-orc barbarian chopped someone in half once or twice, but we [i]all[/i] remember the time that the big, dumb Shump decided to moon the bandits as the heroes escaped over the lake, only to take a heavy crossbow bolt to the butt. Or the memorable time in a supers game that the psychic ninja was introduced to Seinfeld, and questioned whether she should laugh at Kramer because, "That man has ammusing hair." It's entirely a matter of playstyle. But for me, the more chances I have to make the character described on the character sheet in front of me interact with the world the GM is describing in the way that I envision that character interacting with it (for better or for worse), the happier I am. And when I can take my character home to level up or to spend a few more points that I earned, I essentially get to take the game home with me. And that's pretty darn sweet. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
POLL: Would you play D&D without a Skill System?
Top