Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Million Dollar TTRPG Crowdfunders
Most Anticipated Tabletop RPGs Of The Year
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
ShortQuests -- individual adventure modules! An all-new collection of digest-sized D&D adventures designed to plug in to your game.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
[Poly] What's happening to Polyhedron/Dungeon?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="BryonD" data-source="post: 1065237" data-attributes="member: 957"><p>That is fair enough.</p><p></p><p>However, I myself have never insulted Poly in any way, much less in a manner that approached the vitriol Ranger REG spewed toward Dungeon. On at least two occasions I commented on the irony of his being "on Pazio's team" while slamming the other half of the product.</p><p></p><p>So I'll hope you understand that I find it more than a little ironic that you hold me (a Dungeon fan) accountable for other people's words, while giving Ranger REG (a Poly fan) a total free pass for his own.</p><p></p><p>And yes, I have complained about what I have perceived as unprofessional behavior. But never once did I claim Poly was a bad product. I have stated numerous times that it simply does not interest me and I will not buy it.</p><p></p><p>I am forced to wonder why you perceive anything less than praise of Poly as an insult while remaining oblivous of direct insults to Dungeon (to the point of praising the insulters).</p><p></p><p>The apparent conclusion is that you yourself are far more enamoured with Poly than with Dungeon. And please understand, that isn't me trying to attack you and claim that you are some anti-dungeon jerk or anything like that. I'm just stating my opinion that the evidence available suggests that your pride and dedication goes first to Poly. </p><p></p><p>Just today you pledged your undying dedication to Poly. I have never been under the impression that the same personal devotion exists toward Dungeon. Professional desire for a successful and quality product, sure. But personal commitment as shown for Poly, apparently not.</p><p></p><p>Oh, and when I got the idea you are feuding with me.....</p><p></p><p>That would start in January. Johnny started a thread here asking for feedback regarding the (then) new 50/50 plan. I was among the first people to say I did not like it. (Even then I wished you luck and just stated that I simply would not buy a product I did not want). Next thing I know you are replying directly to me in a hostile and indignant manner. Repeat this basic scenario 3 or 4 times and it starts to seem like a feud.</p><p></p><p>Lastly, please recall that before Paizo took over WotC promised that the addition of Poly to Dungeon was a GREAT deal for us Dungeon fans because we would still get all the Dungeon pages and soem bonus Poly pages as a free addition. VERY shortly after that time Paizo takes over, and proceeds to ignore the promises that WotC made. To my mind (and I daresay, a few other Dungeon fans) when one acquires a publication, they acquire the obligations and promises of the publication. At least a polite, formal, we are sorry but we can't do what they said would have been nice. Instead we got, Here's the new plan, anybody who doesn't like it is a mean jerk.</p><p></p><p>So I think we deserve a LITTLE slack.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="BryonD, post: 1065237, member: 957"] That is fair enough. However, I myself have never insulted Poly in any way, much less in a manner that approached the vitriol Ranger REG spewed toward Dungeon. On at least two occasions I commented on the irony of his being "on Pazio's team" while slamming the other half of the product. So I'll hope you understand that I find it more than a little ironic that you hold me (a Dungeon fan) accountable for other people's words, while giving Ranger REG (a Poly fan) a total free pass for his own. And yes, I have complained about what I have perceived as unprofessional behavior. But never once did I claim Poly was a bad product. I have stated numerous times that it simply does not interest me and I will not buy it. I am forced to wonder why you perceive anything less than praise of Poly as an insult while remaining oblivous of direct insults to Dungeon (to the point of praising the insulters). The apparent conclusion is that you yourself are far more enamoured with Poly than with Dungeon. And please understand, that isn't me trying to attack you and claim that you are some anti-dungeon jerk or anything like that. I'm just stating my opinion that the evidence available suggests that your pride and dedication goes first to Poly. Just today you pledged your undying dedication to Poly. I have never been under the impression that the same personal devotion exists toward Dungeon. Professional desire for a successful and quality product, sure. But personal commitment as shown for Poly, apparently not. Oh, and when I got the idea you are feuding with me..... That would start in January. Johnny started a thread here asking for feedback regarding the (then) new 50/50 plan. I was among the first people to say I did not like it. (Even then I wished you luck and just stated that I simply would not buy a product I did not want). Next thing I know you are replying directly to me in a hostile and indignant manner. Repeat this basic scenario 3 or 4 times and it starts to seem like a feud. Lastly, please recall that before Paizo took over WotC promised that the addition of Poly to Dungeon was a GREAT deal for us Dungeon fans because we would still get all the Dungeon pages and soem bonus Poly pages as a free addition. VERY shortly after that time Paizo takes over, and proceeds to ignore the promises that WotC made. To my mind (and I daresay, a few other Dungeon fans) when one acquires a publication, they acquire the obligations and promises of the publication. At least a polite, formal, we are sorry but we can't do what they said would have been nice. Instead we got, Here's the new plan, anybody who doesn't like it is a mean jerk. So I think we deserve a LITTLE slack. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
[Poly] What's happening to Polyhedron/Dungeon?
Top