Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
[Poly] What's happening to Polyhedron/Dungeon?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Mapmaker" data-source="post: 1070451" data-attributes="member: 9272"><p>Erik has been nothing but real with us, near as I can tell. He has spoken more candidly about the magazine's prospects and circumstances than most magazine editors would ever do in a public forum such as this, and it speaks volumes about his good character and dedication to the readers.</p><p></p><p></p><p>Dungeon readers and Dungeon "purists" are not one and the same.</p><p></p><p></p><p>By demanding that Polyhedron be separated from Dungeon and refering to Dungeon in derogatory terms, how is this attitude any different from that which you protest?</p><p></p><p></p><p>I think most readers would rather it not "go out" at all...and indeed I see little likelihood that it's even in danger of doing so.</p><p></p><p></p><p>If the choice you speak of is Polyhedron or no Polyhedron, I think the choice has already been made, and it's to keep Polyhedron. If you feel that the content of future issues isn't of sufficient quality or quantity to earn your money, the choice of what to do with that money is yours, not Erik's. I think he'd appreciate it, though, if we wait to see that content before we judge it. He's hardly even been in the driver's seat of the whole magazine for a few weeks, and already some of his 'loudest supporters' want to get out and hail a cab? Sheesh. At least let him show us how well he can parallel park... <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" /></p><p></p><p>He's doing the best he can in a complex situation to keep both sides of the magazine prosperous. It has already been established that the magazines can't yet flourish separately, so if we want them to someday reach that state we need to let the folks in charge (who are even more attached to Polyhedron than we are, I assure you) make the tough choices and steer the ship in the right direction. After all, they have a much clearer view of the financial horizon than any of us, and know better than anyone what course changes are necessary to stay on track.</p><p></p><p>All of this is not to say that feedback should be silenced. On the contrary: voicing an opinion is most definiately a good thing. It's much more helpful, though, if provided in a way that's respectful of the efforts of the people involved.</p><p></p><p>Anyway, there's my two cents. Make of it what you wish. <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" /></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Mapmaker, post: 1070451, member: 9272"] Erik has been nothing but real with us, near as I can tell. He has spoken more candidly about the magazine's prospects and circumstances than most magazine editors would ever do in a public forum such as this, and it speaks volumes about his good character and dedication to the readers. Dungeon readers and Dungeon "purists" are not one and the same. By demanding that Polyhedron be separated from Dungeon and refering to Dungeon in derogatory terms, how is this attitude any different from that which you protest? I think most readers would rather it not "go out" at all...and indeed I see little likelihood that it's even in danger of doing so. If the choice you speak of is Polyhedron or no Polyhedron, I think the choice has already been made, and it's to keep Polyhedron. If you feel that the content of future issues isn't of sufficient quality or quantity to earn your money, the choice of what to do with that money is yours, not Erik's. I think he'd appreciate it, though, if we wait to see that content before we judge it. He's hardly even been in the driver's seat of the whole magazine for a few weeks, and already some of his 'loudest supporters' want to get out and hail a cab? Sheesh. At least let him show us how well he can parallel park... :) He's doing the best he can in a complex situation to keep both sides of the magazine prosperous. It has already been established that the magazines can't yet flourish separately, so if we want them to someday reach that state we need to let the folks in charge (who are even more attached to Polyhedron than we are, I assure you) make the tough choices and steer the ship in the right direction. After all, they have a much clearer view of the financial horizon than any of us, and know better than anyone what course changes are necessary to stay on track. All of this is not to say that feedback should be silenced. On the contrary: voicing an opinion is most definiately a good thing. It's much more helpful, though, if provided in a way that's respectful of the efforts of the people involved. Anyway, there's my two cents. Make of it what you wish. :) [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
[Poly] What's happening to Polyhedron/Dungeon?
Top