Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
[Polyhedron] Are women interested in this type of fantasy?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Dr. Strangemonkey" data-source="post: 978280" data-attributes="member: 6533"><p><strong>Re: Re: Can't resist any more...</strong></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>No offense intended, SJ, but the while there may be a vast distinction between turning Human Nature and turning the World upside down they are both such sufficiently vast acts as to invite a certain amount of criticism and, potentially, ridicule.</p><p></p><p>In fact I'd say the vastness implicit in that statement is the cause of the issue a lot of people are taking with your arguments, rather than the more civilized dispute people have had or not had with your argument overall.</p><p></p><p>While you are certainly well within the rights of any discourse to state a belief in a human nature and to ascribe certain attributes to that right, your opponents are equally within their rights to attack the argument based on the impossibility of accurately addressing such a topic through such means as a small, specific, and local portion of the human race.</p><p></p><p>Indeed, even were it possible to demonstrate that every member of the human race currently shares such a broad and essentially rhetorical quality the argument would still be limited by the fact that it would only address such a portion of the human race as exists now, not those of the past or future or in other potential circumstances.</p><p></p><p>A less absolutely worded version of the argument would contribute a great deal to its credibility, allow the topic to return to its focus, and cause less consternation all around.</p><p></p><p>This is the sort of thing Compositionists all over America, and elsewhere I assume, have to continually address. If it doesn't get done rhetoric tends to get bogged down in arguments over means and semantics, as it has here, to the tune of much mutual frustration.</p><p></p><p>Also please fix the grammar error in your signature, clergy is a plural group noun and does not agree with has. Looks like a grammar checker got to it and mangled it. Not normally a problem in this informal medium, but seeing the same error everytime I read your otherwise fascinating messages did make me want to speak out about it.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Dr. Strangemonkey, post: 978280, member: 6533"] [b]Re: Re: Can't resist any more...[/b] No offense intended, SJ, but the while there may be a vast distinction between turning Human Nature and turning the World upside down they are both such sufficiently vast acts as to invite a certain amount of criticism and, potentially, ridicule. In fact I'd say the vastness implicit in that statement is the cause of the issue a lot of people are taking with your arguments, rather than the more civilized dispute people have had or not had with your argument overall. While you are certainly well within the rights of any discourse to state a belief in a human nature and to ascribe certain attributes to that right, your opponents are equally within their rights to attack the argument based on the impossibility of accurately addressing such a topic through such means as a small, specific, and local portion of the human race. Indeed, even were it possible to demonstrate that every member of the human race currently shares such a broad and essentially rhetorical quality the argument would still be limited by the fact that it would only address such a portion of the human race as exists now, not those of the past or future or in other potential circumstances. A less absolutely worded version of the argument would contribute a great deal to its credibility, allow the topic to return to its focus, and cause less consternation all around. This is the sort of thing Compositionists all over America, and elsewhere I assume, have to continually address. If it doesn't get done rhetoric tends to get bogged down in arguments over means and semantics, as it has here, to the tune of much mutual frustration. Also please fix the grammar error in your signature, clergy is a plural group noun and does not agree with has. Looks like a grammar checker got to it and mangled it. Not normally a problem in this informal medium, but seeing the same error everytime I read your otherwise fascinating messages did make me want to speak out about it. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
[Polyhedron] Are women interested in this type of fantasy?
Top