Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Polymorph and Natural Abilities
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="IceBear" data-source="post: 611975" data-attributes="member: 1118"><p>Ah, it was you <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f600.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":D" title="Big grin :D" data-smilie="8"data-shortname=":D" />. I apologize to you Ki Ryn <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" /></p><p></p><p>The thing is, I DO get it (and I even said I knew it had been errata'ed to death so the PHB errata was probably out of date), and I have read the other threads (it was me and hong vs you in the last one)</p><p></p><p>Anyway, I'm going to stick with constrict being a "natural" ability for this spell as it just makes senses to me, while following the letter of an overly errata'ed spell does not.</p><p></p><p>See what I was talking about Dan - there are people that believe there ARE natural abilities (other than movement) just because there is a defined term (much like a shield bonus). Spirit vs Letter. Spirit vs Letter. </p><p></p><p>I only posted this for hong's benefit, in case he hadn't seen that, and not to get into this again because neither of us are going to switch positions on this.</p><p></p><p>IceBear</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="IceBear, post: 611975, member: 1118"] Ah, it was you :D. I apologize to you Ki Ryn :) The thing is, I DO get it (and I even said I knew it had been errata'ed to death so the PHB errata was probably out of date), and I have read the other threads (it was me and hong vs you in the last one) Anyway, I'm going to stick with constrict being a "natural" ability for this spell as it just makes senses to me, while following the letter of an overly errata'ed spell does not. See what I was talking about Dan - there are people that believe there ARE natural abilities (other than movement) just because there is a defined term (much like a shield bonus). Spirit vs Letter. Spirit vs Letter. I only posted this for hong's benefit, in case he hadn't seen that, and not to get into this again because neither of us are going to switch positions on this. IceBear [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Polymorph and Natural Abilities
Top