Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Million Dollar TTRPG Crowdfunders
Most Anticipated Tabletop RPGs Of The Year
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Polymorphing outsiders and undead
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="KarinsDad" data-source="post: 1199344" data-attributes="member: 2011"><p>No, but the spell text does not make sense in your example here. Drop the outsiders and elementals from it to see what I mean:</p><p></p><p>"You cannot change subjects into constructs or undead unless they already are one of these types. Undead and Constructs are immune to spells requiring a Fort save unless the spell also affects objects."</p><p></p><p>In sentence one you are saying that "this spell cannot do this unless" and in sentence two, you are saying that "this spell cannot do this".</p><p></p><p>That is totally nonsensical to have these two sentences within the same spell description.</p><p></p><p>There is no need for the first sentence if the meaning is the second sentence.</p><p></p><p>However, the first sentence IS in PO, hence, it means what it says and takes precedence.</p><p></p><p>And, even if the first sentence was written your way above, it would STILL mean that PO overwrites the general rule. The way you rewrote it doesn't change the meaning.</p><p></p><p>"If it's not, you cannot" is the same as "If it is, you can".</p><p></p><p>You are grasping at straws here.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Except that sentence two overrides sentence one because you put it into the spell description.</p><p></p><p>With your interpretation, the sentence in PO should read:</p><p></p><p>"You cannot change subjects into elementals or outsiders unless they already are one of these types."</p><p></p><p>There is absolutely no reason to have undead or constructs in that sentence at all, even in the way you rewrote it.</p><p></p><p>Please explain to me why undead and constructs are needed in the sentence at all if your interpretation is correct?</p><p></p><p>Why are undead and constructs mentioned in the spell at all when the no fort save rule takes care of them in the "cannot do" case already?</p><p></p><p>If you drop them, then your interpretation rules (pun intended). With them in the sentence, my interpretation rules.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>This analogy is totally different. </p><p></p><p>Cure Light Wounds does not state that you can suddenly do sneak attack damage against undead. If it did, you could, regardless of the sneak attack rule.</p><p></p><p>Polymorph Others, on the other hand, DOES state that you can change undead IF they are "one of these types" ("cannot unless" means the same thing as "can if" or even "if not, cannot" as you rephrased it).</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="KarinsDad, post: 1199344, member: 2011"] No, but the spell text does not make sense in your example here. Drop the outsiders and elementals from it to see what I mean: "You cannot change subjects into constructs or undead unless they already are one of these types. Undead and Constructs are immune to spells requiring a Fort save unless the spell also affects objects." In sentence one you are saying that "this spell cannot do this unless" and in sentence two, you are saying that "this spell cannot do this". That is totally nonsensical to have these two sentences within the same spell description. There is no need for the first sentence if the meaning is the second sentence. However, the first sentence IS in PO, hence, it means what it says and takes precedence. And, even if the first sentence was written your way above, it would STILL mean that PO overwrites the general rule. The way you rewrote it doesn't change the meaning. "If it's not, you cannot" is the same as "If it is, you can". You are grasping at straws here. Except that sentence two overrides sentence one because you put it into the spell description. With your interpretation, the sentence in PO should read: "You cannot change subjects into elementals or outsiders unless they already are one of these types." There is absolutely no reason to have undead or constructs in that sentence at all, even in the way you rewrote it. Please explain to me why undead and constructs are needed in the sentence at all if your interpretation is correct? Why are undead and constructs mentioned in the spell at all when the no fort save rule takes care of them in the "cannot do" case already? If you drop them, then your interpretation rules (pun intended). With them in the sentence, my interpretation rules. This analogy is totally different. Cure Light Wounds does not state that you can suddenly do sneak attack damage against undead. If it did, you could, regardless of the sneak attack rule. Polymorph Others, on the other hand, DOES state that you can change undead IF they are "one of these types" ("cannot unless" means the same thing as "can if" or even "if not, cannot" as you rephrased it). [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Polymorphing outsiders and undead
Top