Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Post PHB thoughts after a play-through...
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Eirikrautha" data-source="post: 6357258" data-attributes="member: 6777843"><p>Got my PHB Friday and rolled up a pair of characters for a game Saturday. It was my first time playing with a group that has been playing since the basic rules were published on the web. I rolled up a Warlock and Fighter (so that I could make sure to fit in wherever needed).</p><p></p><p>The first thing I noticed was how much faster rolling up a character is in 5e compared with 3e/PF (which is what I've most recently played), even using all of the options in the PHB. In fact, most of my time was spent reading the rules and options. Once a player is familiar with all of the options (hard to do in less than 24 hours), I would guess he/she could go from concept to playing in 15 minutes. This is especially true if you are starting at 1st level. I caught myself spending time deciding between options that I would then realize didn't matter until 3rd level. So if you are starting at 3rd, you might have to put in another 10-15 minutes, but, otherwise, character creation was fast.</p><p></p><p>Unfortunately, the game I joined was geared a little more for complete beginners that I had anticipated, and the table was full (8 PCs). For this reason, I decided to play my Fighter (future eldritch knight), as my Warlock was designed to be more of a role-playing character. It's a lot easier to roleplay when you have 3-5 PCs, because turns can still be quick. With 8 PCs plus mobs, turns can drag a little.</p><p></p><p>Our campaign was a homebrew dungeon crawl on a grid, with two intro encounters, a BBEG, then another large intro fight, to be followed with a second BBEG (that we didn't get to). Some random observations to follow:</p><p></p><p></p><ul> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">Rogues (especially TWF) a pretty good at low level! My duelist fighter consistently dropped one mook per hit (and I hit about 50-60% of the time). The rogues were hitting about as often, but usually taking ~1.5 hits to kill a mook without sneak attack. With it, they were just as good as my fighter. Good rolls and/or sneak attack did lead to several cases where they would drop a mook, move to a second, take their bonus action to hit, and drop that one. Until some fighters get their second attack and surpass them, TWF rogues appear to be quite effective in dealing damage.</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">Most characters contributed every round. Gone are the days where a wizard would sit back and fire a crossbow bolt with no chance to hit in order to save their spells for a later encounter. With a bonus to hit from their prime attribute pretty much equal to my fighter, wizards with firebolt were contributing just as much every round as any other character. Once melee combatants get multiple attacks the utility might drop a little, but at low levels no one was being "carried." I like it!</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">Advantage is a nice thing to have, but also can be swingy. Our GM was very liberal with advantage (giving it in circumstances where a figure had an an enemy on opposite sides... the old-school "flanking"). Considering that most of us were hitting 50+% of the time (the average mook we faced had an AC of 14-16), the advantage was nice, but not overpowering. It did create the funniest moment of the night: The rogue had advantage on an enemy and swung with both weapons. The first two d20 for his main attack came up 5 & 5. He rerolled for the bonus attack and got another 5 & 5. We lost it at that point!</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">At low level it's better to roll to hit than have the enemy roll a save. Our firebolts hit way more often than the clerics' sacred flame. Maybe that was just a feature of our rolls, but it did seem pretty consistent. This will probably change at higher levels as well.</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">Healing in combat is back! I went down due to a tactical mistake on my part, and healing word saved my bacon. Especially for the first couple of levels, no party with a cleric should have a death (unless the CR is way higher than it should be). HP are low enough at low levels that healing really matters during combat. Once we get higher, all bets are off.</li> </ul><p></p><p>I'm looking forward to a non-crawl in the near future, but so far I'm really enjoying the speed of play and old-school feel I'm getting from 5e. I like the fact that all character classes seem to have a role in combat from the very beginning. I'm curious to see if other folks have had the same experiences, especially now that the PHB has expanded the options for players...</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Eirikrautha, post: 6357258, member: 6777843"] Got my PHB Friday and rolled up a pair of characters for a game Saturday. It was my first time playing with a group that has been playing since the basic rules were published on the web. I rolled up a Warlock and Fighter (so that I could make sure to fit in wherever needed). The first thing I noticed was how much faster rolling up a character is in 5e compared with 3e/PF (which is what I've most recently played), even using all of the options in the PHB. In fact, most of my time was spent reading the rules and options. Once a player is familiar with all of the options (hard to do in less than 24 hours), I would guess he/she could go from concept to playing in 15 minutes. This is especially true if you are starting at 1st level. I caught myself spending time deciding between options that I would then realize didn't matter until 3rd level. So if you are starting at 3rd, you might have to put in another 10-15 minutes, but, otherwise, character creation was fast. Unfortunately, the game I joined was geared a little more for complete beginners that I had anticipated, and the table was full (8 PCs). For this reason, I decided to play my Fighter (future eldritch knight), as my Warlock was designed to be more of a role-playing character. It's a lot easier to roleplay when you have 3-5 PCs, because turns can still be quick. With 8 PCs plus mobs, turns can drag a little. Our campaign was a homebrew dungeon crawl on a grid, with two intro encounters, a BBEG, then another large intro fight, to be followed with a second BBEG (that we didn't get to). Some random observations to follow: [LIST] [*]Rogues (especially TWF) a pretty good at low level! My duelist fighter consistently dropped one mook per hit (and I hit about 50-60% of the time). The rogues were hitting about as often, but usually taking ~1.5 hits to kill a mook without sneak attack. With it, they were just as good as my fighter. Good rolls and/or sneak attack did lead to several cases where they would drop a mook, move to a second, take their bonus action to hit, and drop that one. Until some fighters get their second attack and surpass them, TWF rogues appear to be quite effective in dealing damage. [*]Most characters contributed every round. Gone are the days where a wizard would sit back and fire a crossbow bolt with no chance to hit in order to save their spells for a later encounter. With a bonus to hit from their prime attribute pretty much equal to my fighter, wizards with firebolt were contributing just as much every round as any other character. Once melee combatants get multiple attacks the utility might drop a little, but at low levels no one was being "carried." I like it! [*]Advantage is a nice thing to have, but also can be swingy. Our GM was very liberal with advantage (giving it in circumstances where a figure had an an enemy on opposite sides... the old-school "flanking"). Considering that most of us were hitting 50+% of the time (the average mook we faced had an AC of 14-16), the advantage was nice, but not overpowering. It did create the funniest moment of the night: The rogue had advantage on an enemy and swung with both weapons. The first two d20 for his main attack came up 5 & 5. He rerolled for the bonus attack and got another 5 & 5. We lost it at that point! [*]At low level it's better to roll to hit than have the enemy roll a save. Our firebolts hit way more often than the clerics' sacred flame. Maybe that was just a feature of our rolls, but it did seem pretty consistent. This will probably change at higher levels as well. [*]Healing in combat is back! I went down due to a tactical mistake on my part, and healing word saved my bacon. Especially for the first couple of levels, no party with a cleric should have a death (unless the CR is way higher than it should be). HP are low enough at low levels that healing really matters during combat. Once we get higher, all bets are off. [/LIST] I'm looking forward to a non-crawl in the near future, but so far I'm really enjoying the speed of play and old-school feel I'm getting from 5e. I like the fact that all character classes seem to have a role in combat from the very beginning. I'm curious to see if other folks have had the same experiences, especially now that the PHB has expanded the options for players... [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Post PHB thoughts after a play-through...
Top