Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="slwoyach" data-source="post: 4813617" data-attributes="member: 1022">Some class limitations should remain for flavor purposes.&nbsp; Few things in 3e get my boxers in a bunch quite like a dwarven wizard.&nbsp; Blasphemy!This is trickier.&nbsp; Level limitations are horrible.&nbsp; In games that go over a certain level it makes demihumans unplayable and in low level games it does nothing to fix the balance issue between humans and demihumans.&nbsp; Basically it is complete fail in every way.&nbsp; A better fix would be to remove them and make humans better.&nbsp; I don't think the 10% experience bump suggested is enough though.&nbsp; Given the choice of having elven abilities or a 10% bump I'll take the elf any day.&nbsp; A good balance might be +1 to all saves.&nbsp; That I'd think about.&nbsp; Or you could pick up a 3e trick and give an LA of +1 to all demihumans.&nbsp; It works far better under the 2e experience system than it ever did in 3e.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="slwoyach, post: 4813617, member: 1022"] Some class limitations should remain for flavor purposes. Few things in 3e get my boxers in a bunch quite like a dwarven wizard. Blasphemy! This is trickier. Level limitations are horrible. In games that go over a certain level it makes demihumans unplayable and in low level games it does nothing to fix the balance issue between humans and demihumans. Basically it is complete fail in every way. A better fix would be to remove them and make humans better. I don't think the 10% experience bump suggested is enough though. Given the choice of having elven abilities or a 10% bump I'll take the elf any day. A good balance might be +1 to all saves. That I'd think about. Or you could pick up a 3e trick and give an LA of +1 to all demihumans. It works far better under the 2e experience system than it ever did in 3e. [/QUOTE]

Verification