NOW LIVE! Today's the day you meet your new best friend. You don’t have to leave Wolfy behind... In 'Pets & Sidekicks' your companions level up with you!

Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Aberzanzorax" data-source="post: 4787736" data-attributes="member: 64209">WOW, this thread exploded like wildfire, complete with flames.  @GMforpowergamers. You'll note, if you go back and read over any/all of my posts, that there was never any sarcasm, ill will, or condescention toward you. I don't know where this post came from:   I'm not at all sure how I am the badwrongfun police. I'm not sure how I was unclear with my prior posts either, or how I can be described as not wanting to discuss their products. Quite frankly, I think you've been awfully unfair to me. I won't hold a grudge or cry myself to sleep or anything, but man, I feel like I'm getting some sort of angry retribuition for genuinely trying to help explain my thoughts to someone who asked for them. Sadly, I fully expect this thread will be locked at some point in the near future, and that is a shame. Clearly anyone who is concerned about the base classes of pathfinder being too powerful (as the OP queried), but at the same time uses the character optimization boards to maximize power level in a campaign (not badwrong fun, but certainly more powerful than the new Paizo base classes), is either ill informed about Pathfinder, has a bone to pick, or has a very different understanding of power/balance than I do.  You are right. I didn't provide evidence. I can't. The book isn't out yet. You can't get evidence from anyone, frankly. If that is what you're asking for, you'll have to wait until August (or if we're lucky, a relevant preview). I did provide what I knew...and that is that the other classes are supposed to have been ramped up while clerics and druids have been toned down. So, in that very general sense, CODzillas will be less of an issue. I gave specifics as to how I would have done it and things they might have considered, but I don't have the final product, and I can't tell you what they actually did. Wish I could, because then I'd be gleefully looking it over.  I do think it is petty to attack grammar or spelling, and a low blow. I also think that this thread is very quickly devolving. It needn't, but it will so long as inflammatory and vitriolic statements are being spewed.  So, maybe we can all turn it around, step back from the arguing back and forth, and talk about Pathfinder?</blockquote>

Verification