Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="hong" data-source="post: 3345405" data-attributes="member: 537">Nonsense.Nonsense. It comes from a desire to provide an alternative to the tired and overdone machine-gun archer schtick, whereby the archer stands and runs through the 1,000 arrows stored in the bag of holding.Whether or not this is true has nothing to do with whether or not the machine-gun archer schtick is enjoyable or desirable. As said before, a flavour rather than balance consideration.I died a little on reading that.Well, um, this is why, you know, a ranged power-attack feat has, uh, the consequence that ranged attackers would have to rely on their mobility and ability to attack from outside melee range.Or maybe not. It's possible that I missed something here.D00d, have you ever put +10 worth of stuff on an arrow? Seriously, please.Your point being...?Demonstrate how providing an alternative to machine-gun archery increases the ranged attacker's advantage.History is bunk.</blockquote>