Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Power Attack too useful? When is it NOT taken?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="KarinsDad" data-source="post: 2215031" data-attributes="member: 2011"><p>The Amulets were slightly more expensive because the Wizardress / Artificer had to get the local Druid to help as well. Course, the PCs had previously helped out the Druid, so he was willing to help (for a small fee <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f609.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=";)" title="Wink ;)" data-smilie="2"data-shortname=";)" />) since the XP for the items was coming from the Wizardress.</p><p></p><p>Rings of Protection item creation by PCs, however, should be relatively rare at lower level, just due to the fact that Forge Ring is a minimum 12th level caster feat. Very few of the NPCs that PCs at lower levels should meet should be capable of forging them. In fact, very few NPCs should ever have the feat in their lifetimes, regardless of their current level, merely due to the number of item creation feats (and other useful feats) and the greater utility of many of the other item creation feats. So, if you get a Ring of Protection, typically it should be because you find them, not because you have them made for you. Hence, Ring of Protection creation should rarely be an option.</p><p></p><p></p><p>But, I don't understand the DM motivation of making someone's hide look like bark as a deterrent to taking an Amulet of Natural Armor in a game system where balance is decided by a fixed set of character level monetary expectations, modifier possibilities (i.e. different bonuses that stack) and rules on exponential cost increases for a linear increase in magical potency. Even the spell Barkskin does not actually make your skin change appearance (at least in the SRD), it merely toughens your skin.</p><p></p><p>Why would you want to discourage your players like this?</p><p></p><p>I can see having the players have to work at either finding a Druid willing to craft items for them and who also has the Craft Wondrous Items feat, or finding a Druid willing to work with some other class NPC who has the Craft Wondrous Item feat who is also willing to craft items for the PCs. That's a roleplaying challenge.</p><p></p><p>But, I wouldn't change the appearance of the character with such an item. That's a penalty to the PC for no good reason and it automatically gives free information to NPCs about one of the PC's items that they shouldn't have. IMO.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="KarinsDad, post: 2215031, member: 2011"] The Amulets were slightly more expensive because the Wizardress / Artificer had to get the local Druid to help as well. Course, the PCs had previously helped out the Druid, so he was willing to help (for a small fee ;)) since the XP for the items was coming from the Wizardress. Rings of Protection item creation by PCs, however, should be relatively rare at lower level, just due to the fact that Forge Ring is a minimum 12th level caster feat. Very few of the NPCs that PCs at lower levels should meet should be capable of forging them. In fact, very few NPCs should ever have the feat in their lifetimes, regardless of their current level, merely due to the number of item creation feats (and other useful feats) and the greater utility of many of the other item creation feats. So, if you get a Ring of Protection, typically it should be because you find them, not because you have them made for you. Hence, Ring of Protection creation should rarely be an option. But, I don't understand the DM motivation of making someone's hide look like bark as a deterrent to taking an Amulet of Natural Armor in a game system where balance is decided by a fixed set of character level monetary expectations, modifier possibilities (i.e. different bonuses that stack) and rules on exponential cost increases for a linear increase in magical potency. Even the spell Barkskin does not actually make your skin change appearance (at least in the SRD), it merely toughens your skin. Why would you want to discourage your players like this? I can see having the players have to work at either finding a Druid willing to craft items for them and who also has the Craft Wondrous Items feat, or finding a Druid willing to work with some other class NPC who has the Craft Wondrous Item feat who is also willing to craft items for the PCs. That's a roleplaying challenge. But, I wouldn't change the appearance of the character with such an item. That's a penalty to the PC for no good reason and it automatically gives free information to NPCs about one of the PC's items that they shouldn't have. IMO. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Power Attack too useful? When is it NOT taken?
Top