Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Power Attack Woes :(
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="delericho" data-source="post: 2364088" data-attributes="member: 22424"><p><strong>A different analysis</strong></p><p></p><p>If we build a Fighter20 who uses the two-bladed sword as his weapon of choice, we should be able to get a good analysis of the relative strengths and weaknesses of two-weapon versus two-handed fighting, since this same character is capable of both. Now, it's worth noting that such a character will necessarily have spent all the money and feats on buffing up his two-weapon style, which the two-handed specialist will have spent those same feats on something else, so it's not a perfect comparison. Still, it's probably not too bad.</p><p></p><p>So, here's the test character I propose to use:</p><p></p><p>Fighter 20.</p><p>Str 26 (15 start, +5 level, +6 item)</p><p>Dex 19 (13 start, +6 item)</p><p></p><p>Feats: Exotic Weapon Proficiency, Weapon Focus, Weapon Spec, Greater Weapon Focus, Greater Weapon Spec, Improved Critical (two-bladed sword), Power Attack, Two-weapon Fighting, Improved Two-weapon Fighting, Greater Two-weapon Fighting</p><p></p><p>Weapon of Choice: Two-bladed sword. (+5 Speed Shock/+5 Flaming Frost) (I assumed the character would spend about 33% of his starting funds on his primary weapon, and this weapon reflects that. I think the exact value of the weapon is 260,700gp.)</p><p></p><p>Two-handed use: +35/+35/+30/+25/+20 on attack rolls, 24 average damage.</p><p></p><p>Two-weapon Use: +33/+33/+28/+23/+18 on attack rolls, 20 average damage and +33/+28/+23 on attack rolls, 20.5 average damage.</p><p></p><p>Assuming the character knows the AC of his opponent (which is a poor assumption, I know), and so can optimise his power attack, we get the following:</p><p></p><p>AC THF PA DMG TWF PA DMG DMG WINNER</p><p>10 20 344.82 15 292.65 344.82 THF</p><p>11 20 366.61 14 287.25 366.61 THF</p><p>12 20 328.4 13 281.85 328.4 THF</p><p>13 19 318.8 12 276.45 318.8 THF</p><p>14 18 309.2 11 271.05 309.2 THF</p><p>15 17 299.6 10 265.65 299.6 THF</p><p>16 16 290 9 260.25 290 THF</p><p>17 15 280.4 8 254.85 280.4 THF</p><p>18 14 270.8 8 249.56 270.8 THF</p><p>19 13 261.2 7 244.28 261.2 THF</p><p>20 12 251.6 7 239.11 251.6 THF</p><p>21 12 242.165 6 233.95 242.165 THF</p><p>22 11 232.925 6 228.9 232.925 THF</p><p>23 11 223.85 5 223.86 223.86 TWF</p><p>24 10 214.97 5 218.93 218.93 TWF</p><p>25 10 206.255 4 214.01 214.01 TWF</p><p>26 9 197.735 4 209.2 209.2 TWF</p><p>27 9 189.38 3 204.4 204.4 TWF</p><p>28 8 181.22 2 199.6 199.6 TWF</p><p>29 8 173.225 1 194.8 194.8 TWF</p><p>30 7 165.425 0 190 190 TWF</p><p>31 6 157.625 0 182.805 182.805 TWF</p><p>32 5 149.825 0 175.61 175.61 TWF</p><p>33 4 142.025 0 168.415 168.415 TWF</p><p>34 3 134.225 0 161.22 161.22 TWF</p><p>35 2 126.425 0 154.025 154.025 TWF</p><p>36 1 118.625 0 142.3388 142.3388 TWF</p><p>37 0 110.825 0 130.76 130.76 TWF</p><p>38 0 102.1088 0 119.2888 119.2888 TWF</p><p>39 0 93.52 0 109.2288 109.2288 TWF</p><p>40 0 85.05875 0 99.16875 99.16875 TWF</p><p>41 0 78.23875 0 88.81625 88.81625 TWF</p><p>42 0 71.41875 0 78.65875 78.65875 TWF</p><p>43 0 64.4075 0 68.69625 68.69625 TWF</p><p>44 0 57.52375 0 61.50125 61.50125 TWF</p><p>45 0 50.7675 0 54.30625 54.30625 TWF</p><p>46 0 45.6525 0 46.81875 46.81875 TWF</p><p>47 0 40.5375 0 39.52625 40.5375 THF</p><p>48 0 35.23125 0 32.42875 35.23125 THF</p><p>49 0 30.0525 0 28.09875 30.0525 THF</p><p>50 0 25.00125 0 23.76875 25.00125 THF</p><p>51 0 21.59125 0 18.985 21.59125 THF</p><p>52 0 18.18125 20 15.575 18.18125 THF</p><p>53 20 18.06875 20 15.575 18.06875 THF</p><p>54 20 18.06875 20 15.575 18.06875 THF</p><p>55+ 20 18.06875 20 15.575 18.06875 THF</p><p></p><p>(I hope that's legible. Also, I hope it's correct. <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" /> )</p><p></p><p>As can be seen from the table, the 2-handed Power Attack mode of combat is superior for the extremely low and extremely high AC values. For the mid-range values, two-weapon combat is superior. Since you would expect those mid-range AC values to be the most commonly encountered, this suggests that two-weapon fighting is the way to go.</p><p></p><p>However, I would point out again that this is only one example. A character optimised for two-handed combat (using a greatsword) won't have spent all those feats on two-weapon combat, and won't have spent as much money on boosting his primary weapon. How much of a difference that makes is uncertain.</p><p></p><p>Edit: I have changed the numbers in the table above following a number of corrections. Basically, the damage values for the various attacks were incorrect, and I'd failed to take into account the fact that extra d6's for energy damage don't double on a critical hit. (And thanks to Frisbeet for pointing out the errors, and for his spreadsheet, which allowed me to check the revised numbers - they might still be wrong, but if so it's due to a copying error on my part.)</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="delericho, post: 2364088, member: 22424"] [b]A different analysis[/b] If we build a Fighter20 who uses the two-bladed sword as his weapon of choice, we should be able to get a good analysis of the relative strengths and weaknesses of two-weapon versus two-handed fighting, since this same character is capable of both. Now, it's worth noting that such a character will necessarily have spent all the money and feats on buffing up his two-weapon style, which the two-handed specialist will have spent those same feats on something else, so it's not a perfect comparison. Still, it's probably not too bad. So, here's the test character I propose to use: Fighter 20. Str 26 (15 start, +5 level, +6 item) Dex 19 (13 start, +6 item) Feats: Exotic Weapon Proficiency, Weapon Focus, Weapon Spec, Greater Weapon Focus, Greater Weapon Spec, Improved Critical (two-bladed sword), Power Attack, Two-weapon Fighting, Improved Two-weapon Fighting, Greater Two-weapon Fighting Weapon of Choice: Two-bladed sword. (+5 Speed Shock/+5 Flaming Frost) (I assumed the character would spend about 33% of his starting funds on his primary weapon, and this weapon reflects that. I think the exact value of the weapon is 260,700gp.) Two-handed use: +35/+35/+30/+25/+20 on attack rolls, 24 average damage. Two-weapon Use: +33/+33/+28/+23/+18 on attack rolls, 20 average damage and +33/+28/+23 on attack rolls, 20.5 average damage. Assuming the character knows the AC of his opponent (which is a poor assumption, I know), and so can optimise his power attack, we get the following: AC THF PA DMG TWF PA DMG DMG WINNER 10 20 344.82 15 292.65 344.82 THF 11 20 366.61 14 287.25 366.61 THF 12 20 328.4 13 281.85 328.4 THF 13 19 318.8 12 276.45 318.8 THF 14 18 309.2 11 271.05 309.2 THF 15 17 299.6 10 265.65 299.6 THF 16 16 290 9 260.25 290 THF 17 15 280.4 8 254.85 280.4 THF 18 14 270.8 8 249.56 270.8 THF 19 13 261.2 7 244.28 261.2 THF 20 12 251.6 7 239.11 251.6 THF 21 12 242.165 6 233.95 242.165 THF 22 11 232.925 6 228.9 232.925 THF 23 11 223.85 5 223.86 223.86 TWF 24 10 214.97 5 218.93 218.93 TWF 25 10 206.255 4 214.01 214.01 TWF 26 9 197.735 4 209.2 209.2 TWF 27 9 189.38 3 204.4 204.4 TWF 28 8 181.22 2 199.6 199.6 TWF 29 8 173.225 1 194.8 194.8 TWF 30 7 165.425 0 190 190 TWF 31 6 157.625 0 182.805 182.805 TWF 32 5 149.825 0 175.61 175.61 TWF 33 4 142.025 0 168.415 168.415 TWF 34 3 134.225 0 161.22 161.22 TWF 35 2 126.425 0 154.025 154.025 TWF 36 1 118.625 0 142.3388 142.3388 TWF 37 0 110.825 0 130.76 130.76 TWF 38 0 102.1088 0 119.2888 119.2888 TWF 39 0 93.52 0 109.2288 109.2288 TWF 40 0 85.05875 0 99.16875 99.16875 TWF 41 0 78.23875 0 88.81625 88.81625 TWF 42 0 71.41875 0 78.65875 78.65875 TWF 43 0 64.4075 0 68.69625 68.69625 TWF 44 0 57.52375 0 61.50125 61.50125 TWF 45 0 50.7675 0 54.30625 54.30625 TWF 46 0 45.6525 0 46.81875 46.81875 TWF 47 0 40.5375 0 39.52625 40.5375 THF 48 0 35.23125 0 32.42875 35.23125 THF 49 0 30.0525 0 28.09875 30.0525 THF 50 0 25.00125 0 23.76875 25.00125 THF 51 0 21.59125 0 18.985 21.59125 THF 52 0 18.18125 20 15.575 18.18125 THF 53 20 18.06875 20 15.575 18.06875 THF 54 20 18.06875 20 15.575 18.06875 THF 55+ 20 18.06875 20 15.575 18.06875 THF (I hope that's legible. Also, I hope it's correct. :) ) As can be seen from the table, the 2-handed Power Attack mode of combat is superior for the extremely low and extremely high AC values. For the mid-range values, two-weapon combat is superior. Since you would expect those mid-range AC values to be the most commonly encountered, this suggests that two-weapon fighting is the way to go. However, I would point out again that this is only one example. A character optimised for two-handed combat (using a greatsword) won't have spent all those feats on two-weapon combat, and won't have spent as much money on boosting his primary weapon. How much of a difference that makes is uncertain. Edit: I have changed the numbers in the table above following a number of corrections. Basically, the damage values for the various attacks were incorrect, and I'd failed to take into account the fact that extra d6's for energy damage don't double on a critical hit. (And thanks to Frisbeet for pointing out the errors, and for his spreadsheet, which allowed me to check the revised numbers - they might still be wrong, but if so it's due to a copying error on my part.) [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Power Attack Woes :(
Top