Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Boone" data-source="post: 86624" data-attributes="member: 2671">I think you have jumped to conclusions of the intent of some of the posts.  No one has suggested that large companies should get the shaft because they are large.What has been suggested is that when any company violates the "perceived" agreement with the consumer.  That is that a company will provide a quality product for X amount of money.  In exchange the consumer will respect the copy right laws so that said company can continue to produce quality products.(Now don't confuse this and think that it has to pertain only to you.... )If said consumer perceives that company did not provide a quality product then consumer could then feel that the contract has been voided and would feel no obligation to support the copy right laws and privelages of said company.   (is this right?  no... does this happen .....  YES)It could be argued that WoTC is unethical due to that WoTC knows that because of the loyalty of its consumer base it is acceptable to cut corners and deliver an inferior product to market quicker and use errata to increase its web attivity.  Not to mention the number of people who hang on the Sage Advice in its other revenue producing publications.  So who is shafting who.....?BTW does power attack apply to range weapons?</blockquote>