Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Power Lunge
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Mistwell" data-source="post: 1127142" data-attributes="member: 2525"><p>I think this debate is worthwhile. I have a character with this feat, and we have been using the interpretation that comes out with the lower damage (+8, not +10). However, I would love to be persuaded that it is the higher number, for obvious reasons.</p><p></p><p>That said, I think it is incredibly silly that two people, on opposite sides of this debate, have both said they <em>KNOW</em> how this feat works. </p><p></p><p>You don't <em>KNOW</em> how this feat works. There is a reasonable dispute about how it works, and we have equally semi-official rulings on both sides of the debate according to folks here. You can offer an opinion as to which you think is the better intepretation. You can offer evidence that one side of the debate has more support in the D&D gaming community than the other. You can analyze the debate based on other official answers about related subjects. But none of that will add up to <em>KNOWING</em> how this feat works. Because we do not know for sure, as long as people can articulate a reasonable intepretation on both sides of the debate and a final and definitive official answer remains elusive.</p><p></p><p>So can we please back off on the certainty used in the language here, and get back to the debate over which intpretation is the one more supported by the rules and logic?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Mistwell, post: 1127142, member: 2525"] I think this debate is worthwhile. I have a character with this feat, and we have been using the interpretation that comes out with the lower damage (+8, not +10). However, I would love to be persuaded that it is the higher number, for obvious reasons. That said, I think it is incredibly silly that two people, on opposite sides of this debate, have both said they [i]KNOW[/i] how this feat works. You don't [i]KNOW[/i] how this feat works. There is a reasonable dispute about how it works, and we have equally semi-official rulings on both sides of the debate according to folks here. You can offer an opinion as to which you think is the better intepretation. You can offer evidence that one side of the debate has more support in the D&D gaming community than the other. You can analyze the debate based on other official answers about related subjects. But none of that will add up to [i]KNOWING[/i] how this feat works. Because we do not know for sure, as long as people can articulate a reasonable intepretation on both sides of the debate and a final and definitive official answer remains elusive. So can we please back off on the certainty used in the language here, and get back to the debate over which intpretation is the one more supported by the rules and logic? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Power Lunge
Top