Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="AtomicPope" data-source="post: 4219659" data-attributes="member: 64790">All we're seeing is a fighter that forgoes the shield and takes up the 2HW.  More damage but less armor.  It's a good choice when there's two tanks in the party.  If the fighter cannot do damage then it's back to 1st, 2nd, or 3rd Edition again.Comparing the damage to a Warlock in a superficial way isn't doing the system any justice.  For starters, we're looking at the most damage we've ever seen for a fighter, in any edition.  That doesn't mean that the Warlocks are being built for damage.  They could be taking more debuffs then damage powers because the rest of the group can do better damage that way.  Also, there's a fighter with the AC of a Rogue in melee.  Quid pro quo.</blockquote>