Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.

Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Upper_Krust" data-source="post: 4928940" data-attributes="member: 326">Hiya paradox mate! <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile    :)"  data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" />If its all mundane stuff I'd just leave it...added to which its 3rd level so I don't have to worry about it any longer. <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f609.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=";)" title="Wink    ;)"  data-smilie="2"data-shortname=";)" />I remember that. Seemed like a little bit more book-keeping than you would ideally want, though I suppose if you had gotten to that point you probably weren't too fussed about a little more book-keeping.I am not sure if people want a fluid model of power (as in one that can wax and wane) for 4E, but its something I'll retain as an option. But I can see some potential problems if you have a party with multiple characters all of disparate levels.Not so bad if you are only gaming one or two PCs, but if circumstances drop one character down a few levels (from worshipper erosion) then it could unbalance the party too much. Then again, maybe I am worrying about that more than I need to - 4E is pretty robust, especially within about 4-5 levels.I suppose.Thanks for sharing. <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile    :)"  data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" /></blockquote>

Verification