Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Enchanted Trinkets Complete--a hardcover book containing over 500 magic items for your D&D games!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Powers like an arcade fighting game
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Mesh Hong" data-source="post: 4644121" data-attributes="member: 73463"><p>OK, I think I understand the system a little better than yesterday. Anyway, regardless of my opinion if you like this system and it applies to both PCs and Monsters then it is probably balanced enough, and if it works for you then there is nothing wrong with it.</p><p> </p><p>I have a couple more comments though.</p><p> </p><p>1: How are action points handled? I am assuming that you have removed them as it would double the number of attacks possible in a round.</p><p> </p><p>2: What are your assumptions for handling monster abilities, as they dont have daily and encounter powers, they have encounter and recharge powers.</p><p> </p><p>Do you count monster encounter powers as dailies (3 power points) and recharge as encounters (1 power point)?</p><p> </p><p>3:</p><p></p><p> </p><p>I don't understand how this works, twin strike is 2 attacks in 1 action, if you hit with either attack surely it counts as hitting with the power:</p><p></p><p></p><p>4: I still think this system favours some classes more than others, rogues will benefit with auto combat advantage, bow rangers will be able to throw out massive amounts of damage from 'relative' safety, wizards will get to recharge dailies more often than other classes.</p><p> </p><p>On the flip side wont these rules also change the dynamic of classes like Warlords who's abilities are loosely based around giving modifiers to hit (used to make dailies a lot more reliable).</p><p> </p><p>Again I will repeat that these are only my opinions and if this system works for you then thats great.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Mesh Hong, post: 4644121, member: 73463"] OK, I think I understand the system a little better than yesterday. Anyway, regardless of my opinion if you like this system and it applies to both PCs and Monsters then it is probably balanced enough, and if it works for you then there is nothing wrong with it. I have a couple more comments though. 1: How are action points handled? I am assuming that you have removed them as it would double the number of attacks possible in a round. 2: What are your assumptions for handling monster abilities, as they dont have daily and encounter powers, they have encounter and recharge powers. Do you count monster encounter powers as dailies (3 power points) and recharge as encounters (1 power point)? 3: I don't understand how this works, twin strike is 2 attacks in 1 action, if you hit with either attack surely it counts as hitting with the power: 4: I still think this system favours some classes more than others, rogues will benefit with auto combat advantage, bow rangers will be able to throw out massive amounts of damage from 'relative' safety, wizards will get to recharge dailies more often than other classes. On the flip side wont these rules also change the dynamic of classes like Warlords who's abilities are loosely based around giving modifiers to hit (used to make dailies a lot more reliable). Again I will repeat that these are only my opinions and if this system works for you then thats great. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Powers like an arcade fighting game
Top