Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Practiced Spellcaster Breaks D20
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="FireLance" data-source="post: 1880993" data-attributes="member: 3424"><p>After flipping through the newspaper this morning and looking at a few slimming centre ads, I realized that Practised Spellcaster is similar. It takes something that isn't all that great (a multi-classed spellcaster), makes it look decent for a price (a feat), but doesn't make it better than someone who didn't need it in the first place (a single-classed spellcaster).</p><p></p><p>The "before" and "after" pictures can show a startling improvement, but D&D isn't a competition between a multiclassed spellcaster with the feat and the same multiclassed spellcaster without it (unless your party composition is very interesting). It isn't even a competition between the multiclassed spellcasters and the single-classed spellcasters in the party (unless that's how you want to play the game). But even if it is, the single-classed spellcaster will still have an edge over the multi-classed ones in terms of spell access and spells per day - in particular, the higher level spell slots.</p><p></p><p>Think about the various kinds of multi-classed spellcasters. There's the dabbler, who only has a few levels in a spellcaster class. He gets the full effect of the caster level increase, but the power of the feat is limited by the number of spells that he can cast per day and the low-level spells that he has access to.</p><p></p><p>There's the majority spellcaster who has only a few levels in another class. He has almost as many spells and almost the same level of access to powerful spells as a single-classed spellcaster, and Practised Spellcaster would improve most of them. However, since he is so close to being a single-classed spellcaster, the actual caster level increase that he enjoys is small.</p><p></p><p>Finally, there's the balanced spellcaster who keeps his levels in spellcaster classes even with those of another class (possibly another spellcaster class). He gets the full effect of the caster level increase on a wider number and variety of spells, including some powerful ones, but in doing so he almost certainly misses out on the most powerful spells at less than epic levels.</p><p></p><p>Practised Spellcaster is a good feat and a good fix for a multiclassing system that shortchanges spellcasters. It gives the most benefit to those who need it most without allowing them to overshadow or outdo single-classed spellcasters. Of course, it would be better if the multiclassing system was fixed in the first place.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="FireLance, post: 1880993, member: 3424"] After flipping through the newspaper this morning and looking at a few slimming centre ads, I realized that Practised Spellcaster is similar. It takes something that isn't all that great (a multi-classed spellcaster), makes it look decent for a price (a feat), but doesn't make it better than someone who didn't need it in the first place (a single-classed spellcaster). The "before" and "after" pictures can show a startling improvement, but D&D isn't a competition between a multiclassed spellcaster with the feat and the same multiclassed spellcaster without it (unless your party composition is very interesting). It isn't even a competition between the multiclassed spellcasters and the single-classed spellcasters in the party (unless that's how you want to play the game). But even if it is, the single-classed spellcaster will still have an edge over the multi-classed ones in terms of spell access and spells per day - in particular, the higher level spell slots. Think about the various kinds of multi-classed spellcasters. There's the dabbler, who only has a few levels in a spellcaster class. He gets the full effect of the caster level increase, but the power of the feat is limited by the number of spells that he can cast per day and the low-level spells that he has access to. There's the majority spellcaster who has only a few levels in another class. He has almost as many spells and almost the same level of access to powerful spells as a single-classed spellcaster, and Practised Spellcaster would improve most of them. However, since he is so close to being a single-classed spellcaster, the actual caster level increase that he enjoys is small. Finally, there's the balanced spellcaster who keeps his levels in spellcaster classes even with those of another class (possibly another spellcaster class). He gets the full effect of the caster level increase on a wider number and variety of spells, including some powerful ones, but in doing so he almost certainly misses out on the most powerful spells at less than epic levels. Practised Spellcaster is a good feat and a good fix for a multiclassing system that shortchanges spellcasters. It gives the most benefit to those who need it most without allowing them to overshadow or outdo single-classed spellcasters. Of course, it would be better if the multiclassing system was fixed in the first place. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Practiced Spellcaster Breaks D20
Top