Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Practiced Spellcaster feat
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Thanee" data-source="post: 1663493" data-attributes="member: 478"><p>I think he completely missed the point. <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" /></p><p> </p><p> Yes, there are plenty options to make multiclassed spellcasters better via feats or prestige classes.</p><p> </p><p> There is a reason, why these are especially aimed towards multiclassed spellcasters, and that is, simply put, that multiclassed spellcasters suck.</p><p> </p><p> Ok, now that's a bit harsh and surely not true for every single multiclassed spellcaster, but take for example a cleric/wizard, who takes both classes at an equal level. This character will be about as good as a 14th level character at level 20.</p><p> </p><p> Yes, multiclassing adds versatility and takes away specialization, but multiclassing normally stacks. Hit points, BAB, saves, skills, feats, all these just add up, if you go towards a fighting class, BAB and hit points increase faster, if you go towards a skill class, skills increase faster. With multiclassing you control how fast these aspects of your character improve, and which you want to give more weight to.</p><p> </p><p> However, spellcasting does not stack in any way with any other class, even other spellcasting classes.</p><p> </p><p> There is no improvement, if you advance in other classes, and without an increase in caster level, many of the spells become completely useless later.</p><p> </p><p> That's why there are so many options to improve multiclassed spellcasters, because they are needed to make like 80% of the multiclassed spellcasters viable (pretty much everything but the 1-2 levels of one and 18-19 levels of the other, which works fine without any such options).</p><p> </p><p> Yes, Practiced Spellcaster is obviously better than Spell Penetration, if you have at least two levels of a non-spellcaster class, but that doesn't make it a better feat. For every pure caster it isn't even an option, because the feat won't do anything at all. A multiclassed spellcaster would pick Spell Penetration for the sole reason to keep his offensive spells useful at higher levels, but it isn't really enough to achieve this. In fact, these two feats aren't even compareable, since they are something completely different. Spell Penetration lets you increase your ability to punch through spell resistance beyond your level limit, while Practiced Spellcaster allows you to keep your ability at your level limit, so that the loss of spell levels doesn't result in too many penalties, as it would otherwise (lower caster level, lower spell level, lower spells per day).</p><p> </p><p> Practiced Spellcaster is meant to lessen the impact of multiclassing on the spellcasters, since that impact is <strong>too high</strong> normally.</p><p> </p><p> And it achieves this in a very sensible and balanced way, I might add.</p><p> </p><p> Bye</p><p> Thanee</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Thanee, post: 1663493, member: 478"] I think he completely missed the point. :) Yes, there are plenty options to make multiclassed spellcasters better via feats or prestige classes. There is a reason, why these are especially aimed towards multiclassed spellcasters, and that is, simply put, that multiclassed spellcasters suck. Ok, now that's a bit harsh and surely not true for every single multiclassed spellcaster, but take for example a cleric/wizard, who takes both classes at an equal level. This character will be about as good as a 14th level character at level 20. Yes, multiclassing adds versatility and takes away specialization, but multiclassing normally stacks. Hit points, BAB, saves, skills, feats, all these just add up, if you go towards a fighting class, BAB and hit points increase faster, if you go towards a skill class, skills increase faster. With multiclassing you control how fast these aspects of your character improve, and which you want to give more weight to. However, spellcasting does not stack in any way with any other class, even other spellcasting classes. There is no improvement, if you advance in other classes, and without an increase in caster level, many of the spells become completely useless later. That's why there are so many options to improve multiclassed spellcasters, because they are needed to make like 80% of the multiclassed spellcasters viable (pretty much everything but the 1-2 levels of one and 18-19 levels of the other, which works fine without any such options). Yes, Practiced Spellcaster is obviously better than Spell Penetration, if you have at least two levels of a non-spellcaster class, but that doesn't make it a better feat. For every pure caster it isn't even an option, because the feat won't do anything at all. A multiclassed spellcaster would pick Spell Penetration for the sole reason to keep his offensive spells useful at higher levels, but it isn't really enough to achieve this. In fact, these two feats aren't even compareable, since they are something completely different. Spell Penetration lets you increase your ability to punch through spell resistance beyond your level limit, while Practiced Spellcaster allows you to keep your ability at your level limit, so that the loss of spell levels doesn't result in too many penalties, as it would otherwise (lower caster level, lower spell level, lower spells per day). Practiced Spellcaster is meant to lessen the impact of multiclassing on the spellcasters, since that impact is [b]too high[/b] normally. And it achieves this in a very sensible and balanced way, I might add. Bye Thanee [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Practiced Spellcaster feat
Top