Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Practiced Spellcaster feat
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Methos of Aundair" data-source="post: 1664875" data-attributes="member: 21764"><p>Thanks for the compliment atra2, it is a very good group. The average age of my players is probably around the mid to upper 30’s, and most of the players have been playing since basic DnD, with the least experienced player starting at 1st ed. And yes, I will have to agree that are group isn’t power gamers. Recently my wizard players stated one of the spells he wanted, out of a non-core book, was too weak for it’s 5th level and had no problem with me house ruling it to a 6th level spell, without me even mentioning it, so yes, they aren’t power gamers and don’t want to be. My players like keeping things very balanced. Also, most of them don’t typically multiclass. Your suggestion about letting the Arcane Trickster in our group have the PS feat and playtest it may work but the consensus of our group is that it is unbalanced and they don’t want it in our campaign. This wasn’t just my opinion, but an overall opinion made by the group. Truthfully, none of the group has stated they believed this feat was balanced. Also, as you may be able to understand from the posting I quoted from one of my players is that my group tends to stick to the core books, with occasionally bringing in stuff from supplements or accessories. There is nothing wrong with this, it’s just how we like to play. I have heard on multiple occasions (from our group) about how the gaming industry puts out all these books and we pay for them, only to come back, create another edition and reprint everything with a few modifications. How many of us have boxes and boxes of previous editions stacked away in closets. Many of my players won’t buy the 3.5 books since we have mostly houseruled what we felt were unbalanced and they don't wish to donate more money to WizCo. Neither will they buy the supplements or accessories, I have no problem with this and understand their reasoning. We spent all this money on 3.0 books, now that 3.5 has come out WizCo is reprinting the 3rd ed books for the new edition, more ways to take our money.</p><p></p><p> Sorry about going off on a tangent, just trying to point out our groups’ style.</p><p></p><p> Due to our groups’ style, I brought this feat up for debate on this board so as to see what others thought of it, I’m definitely getting a lot of opinions and suggestions. Hopefully the above references to our gaming style may help you all understand why I think the way I do. My problem isn’t as much with the unbalance of the PS feat, but with the so-called disadvantages of multiclassing. The choice was made, the player knew. Are Arcane Trickster has no problem with his current spellcaster level, and thoroughly enjoys his character.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Methos of Aundair, post: 1664875, member: 21764"] Thanks for the compliment atra2, it is a very good group. The average age of my players is probably around the mid to upper 30’s, and most of the players have been playing since basic DnD, with the least experienced player starting at 1st ed. And yes, I will have to agree that are group isn’t power gamers. Recently my wizard players stated one of the spells he wanted, out of a non-core book, was too weak for it’s 5th level and had no problem with me house ruling it to a 6th level spell, without me even mentioning it, so yes, they aren’t power gamers and don’t want to be. My players like keeping things very balanced. Also, most of them don’t typically multiclass. Your suggestion about letting the Arcane Trickster in our group have the PS feat and playtest it may work but the consensus of our group is that it is unbalanced and they don’t want it in our campaign. This wasn’t just my opinion, but an overall opinion made by the group. Truthfully, none of the group has stated they believed this feat was balanced. Also, as you may be able to understand from the posting I quoted from one of my players is that my group tends to stick to the core books, with occasionally bringing in stuff from supplements or accessories. There is nothing wrong with this, it’s just how we like to play. I have heard on multiple occasions (from our group) about how the gaming industry puts out all these books and we pay for them, only to come back, create another edition and reprint everything with a few modifications. How many of us have boxes and boxes of previous editions stacked away in closets. Many of my players won’t buy the 3.5 books since we have mostly houseruled what we felt were unbalanced and they don't wish to donate more money to WizCo. Neither will they buy the supplements or accessories, I have no problem with this and understand their reasoning. We spent all this money on 3.0 books, now that 3.5 has come out WizCo is reprinting the 3rd ed books for the new edition, more ways to take our money. Sorry about going off on a tangent, just trying to point out our groups’ style. Due to our groups’ style, I brought this feat up for debate on this board so as to see what others thought of it, I’m definitely getting a lot of opinions and suggestions. Hopefully the above references to our gaming style may help you all understand why I think the way I do. My problem isn’t as much with the unbalance of the PS feat, but with the so-called disadvantages of multiclassing. The choice was made, the player knew. Are Arcane Trickster has no problem with his current spellcaster level, and thoroughly enjoys his character. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Practiced Spellcaster feat
Top