Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="ARandomGod" data-source="post: 1666165" data-attributes="member: 17296">Yea 21 levels, reason number two to have to drop either the paladin or the barbarian (as suggested)Although, of course, I chose a non-primary spellcaster on purpose... mainly because the point (that even with the feat, people who would benifit from it are "underpowered" )is pretty plain.On the other hand, some ppl see a thing and just don't want to playtest it, kneejerk reaction saying it's too powerful. That's the feel I'm getting for this statement that the feat is too powerful, a kneejerk reaction without actual playtesting to experiment. There are a number of things that will strike a person one way or another, new feats, ideas, potential PrC's or spells that I've seen strike some people as superpowerful, while playtesting on my part (or on other people's part) has shown the concept to be either well balanced or even generally weaker (Like MT). And the people who refuse to test it for themselves can and sometimes will continue to say that it's overpowered... and noone can be made to see that which they won't look at objectively.</blockquote>