Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Practitioner of The Hala (Commando Unarmed Combat)
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Dagredhel" data-source="post: 349367" data-attributes="member: 3421"><p>Hi Ace. I think your concept is pretty cool, and I like your descriptive text, but I also think your PrC needs some work balance-wise. Here is my critique:</p><p></p><p>1) The requirements are too low, especially for a PrC that packs such a punch (pun intended.) Normally, PrCs have requirements that demand an entrant be around 6th level, if not higher. The requirements should be more stringent if the benefits of the PrC are especially good. A higher BAB requirement is a start. And a BAB of 3+ is actually superfluous, as it is a prerequisite for the Expert Tactician feat also required.</p><p></p><p>2) 4 skill points per level is high for a PrC that only has 7 class skills.</p><p></p><p>3) A few of the special abilities you've developed use a rule mechanic that involves substituting a single AoO to receive the benefit. But this is seriously mitigated by the fact that the Hala Practitioner will have Combat Reflexes (and likely a good Dex.) Further, while Attacks of Opportunity can only be used when the situation warrants it, and only once against a given opponent, the trade-off benefits would be utilizable in every melee. Often, the character would be trading off an AoO that he couldn't use anyway!</p><p></p><p>4) As a 5-level PrC, the Hala Practitioner is unquestionably, tremendously overpowered, receiving 3 bonus feats and something like 4 special abilities, with better skills and skill points than the Fighter, d10 HD, a good Reflex Save, and the best BAB progression. Spreading the progression over 10 levels would help to balance it.</p><p></p><p>5) Most, if not all of the class' special abilities and pseudo-feats should be restricted to use when unarmored and not heavily encumbered.</p><p></p><p>6) I have no idea what this is supposed to mean: </p><p></p><p>It does sound interesting, though.</p><p></p><p>7) Receiving both Improved Trip and Improved Disarm at the same (3rd) level is much, much too powerful. A Fighter receives a bonus feat every other level, by comparison.</p><p></p><p>8) "Breaking Open": Again, way too powerful: This special ability would grant an effective attack bonus (AC penalty) to one attack directed at a particular foe each round, equal to the character's level in the prestige class. With Attacks of Opportunity, the character might even receive the bonus versus multiple adversaries. This ability should be reworked, or severely restricted in usages per day.</p><p></p><p>9) "Master of Opportunity": I think you should consider making the additional AoO equal to the character's Int or Wis bonus, as is done for some of the official WOTC PrCs, rather than doubling the Dex bonus.</p><p></p><p>10) If you draw out the class to 10 levels, consider adding an ability akin to the Duelist's Precise Strike ability (Sword and Fist) that applies to the Hala Practitioner's unarmed attacks.</p><p></p><p>I hope it doesn't sound like I'm being overly harsh. If I didn't think the PrC had great potential and a solid concept behind it, I wouldn't have posted.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Dagredhel, post: 349367, member: 3421"] Hi Ace. I think your concept is pretty cool, and I like your descriptive text, but I also think your PrC needs some work balance-wise. Here is my critique: 1) The requirements are too low, especially for a PrC that packs such a punch (pun intended.) Normally, PrCs have requirements that demand an entrant be around 6th level, if not higher. The requirements should be more stringent if the benefits of the PrC are especially good. A higher BAB requirement is a start. And a BAB of 3+ is actually superfluous, as it is a prerequisite for the Expert Tactician feat also required. 2) 4 skill points per level is high for a PrC that only has 7 class skills. 3) A few of the special abilities you've developed use a rule mechanic that involves substituting a single AoO to receive the benefit. But this is seriously mitigated by the fact that the Hala Practitioner will have Combat Reflexes (and likely a good Dex.) Further, while Attacks of Opportunity can only be used when the situation warrants it, and only once against a given opponent, the trade-off benefits would be utilizable in every melee. Often, the character would be trading off an AoO that he couldn't use anyway! 4) As a 5-level PrC, the Hala Practitioner is unquestionably, tremendously overpowered, receiving 3 bonus feats and something like 4 special abilities, with better skills and skill points than the Fighter, d10 HD, a good Reflex Save, and the best BAB progression. Spreading the progression over 10 levels would help to balance it. 5) Most, if not all of the class' special abilities and pseudo-feats should be restricted to use when unarmored and not heavily encumbered. 6) I have no idea what this is supposed to mean: It does sound interesting, though. 7) Receiving both Improved Trip and Improved Disarm at the same (3rd) level is much, much too powerful. A Fighter receives a bonus feat every other level, by comparison. 8) "Breaking Open": Again, way too powerful: This special ability would grant an effective attack bonus (AC penalty) to one attack directed at a particular foe each round, equal to the character's level in the prestige class. With Attacks of Opportunity, the character might even receive the bonus versus multiple adversaries. This ability should be reworked, or severely restricted in usages per day. 9) "Master of Opportunity": I think you should consider making the additional AoO equal to the character's Int or Wis bonus, as is done for some of the official WOTC PrCs, rather than doubling the Dex bonus. 10) If you draw out the class to 10 levels, consider adding an ability akin to the Duelist's Precise Strike ability (Sword and Fist) that applies to the Hala Practitioner's unarmed attacks. I hope it doesn't sound like I'm being overly harsh. If I didn't think the PrC had great potential and a solid concept behind it, I wouldn't have posted. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Practitioner of The Hala (Commando Unarmed Combat)
Top