Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Pramas: D&D his way??
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Banshee16" data-source="post: 4130217" data-attributes="member: 7883"><p>I'm not sure that I agree here....how is what WotC is doing any different than what Paizo is doing? Yes, they're taking it apart......but they're *really* doing that, so much that a fairly vocal group of people are concerned about the direction in which the game is being taken. At the end of the day, 4E is really just the "take on D&D" that has been developed by the current batch of designers at WotC. I'm very conscious of the fact that a lot of the hype is marketing, and plan on waiting to see the dust settle before making any decisions. When 3E came out, it was supposed to be the one that fixed all the problems of 1st and 2nd Ed. But now it's insufficient?</p><p></p><p>I'd generally contest that there are probably few players that will agree on any edition of the game.</p><p></p><p>At the end of the day, until we've all tried the 4E rules, all we have is the word of the officially sanctioned developers working for WotC as opposed to that of developers working at companies like Paizo and Green Ronin. What makes one developer's word more valid than the other's?</p><p></p><p>If I rip apart a Mustang GT to try to improve on the vehicle, and make a better car, and when I put the pieces together I've got a Civic, I'd contest that I've just wrecked a good car <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" /></p><p></p><p>Banshee</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Banshee16, post: 4130217, member: 7883"] I'm not sure that I agree here....how is what WotC is doing any different than what Paizo is doing? Yes, they're taking it apart......but they're *really* doing that, so much that a fairly vocal group of people are concerned about the direction in which the game is being taken. At the end of the day, 4E is really just the "take on D&D" that has been developed by the current batch of designers at WotC. I'm very conscious of the fact that a lot of the hype is marketing, and plan on waiting to see the dust settle before making any decisions. When 3E came out, it was supposed to be the one that fixed all the problems of 1st and 2nd Ed. But now it's insufficient? I'd generally contest that there are probably few players that will agree on any edition of the game. At the end of the day, until we've all tried the 4E rules, all we have is the word of the officially sanctioned developers working for WotC as opposed to that of developers working at companies like Paizo and Green Ronin. What makes one developer's word more valid than the other's? If I rip apart a Mustang GT to try to improve on the vehicle, and make a better car, and when I put the pieces together I've got a Civic, I'd contest that I've just wrecked a good car :) Banshee [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Pramas: D&D his way??
Top