Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Pramas on 4E and New Gamers
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Slander" data-source="post: 4302006" data-attributes="member: 1593"><p>Has there been any other confirmation of the last comment from that post? :</p><p></p><p></p><p><em>"WOTC has let us retailers know that the launch of 4E is aimed at veteran gamers.</em></p><p><em></em></p><p><em>New players will be targeted in a separate marketing campaign in the fall, likely coinciding with the new starter game in November."</em></p><p></p><p></p><p>Having the intro primer come later may not be a bad thing. Assuming the primer doesn't have <em>different</em> rules, only <em>less</em> rules, I think it makes sense to have a strong base of happy veterans players available with whom new players can game. </p><p></p><p>In this day and age, I personally think large majority of new players are going to come to the game through the veterans, whether directly ("Hey, guy, you wanna try out this new game") or vicariously (through reviews and comments). I'd think only a small portion of new players would arrive by browsing the shelves at B&N, seeing the PHB cover and thinking "Hmm, this looks interesting. Let me try this." In this context, positive word-of-mouth buzz is worth far more than any artificial marketing buzz they could pay for.</p><p></p><p>Therefore, the goal of the initial release was to get a respectable, happy veteran player base which could generate that buzz. If the PHB was a stripped down version of its current form, I think a lot more of the "veterans" would have been PO-ed. As it is, there are already complaints from some veterans of DnD being "dumbed down" or what have you. My personal observation has been there is more positive buzz than negative (for whatever that's worth), which may not have been the case with an even more simplified version. In that respect, the release was a success.</p><p></p><p>But, and this is a big but, they <strong>have</strong> to deliver on a simplified, accessable, and <em>compatible</em> primer (no "one-off" rules in the primer that don't apply to the real game). And Jeff is right, in the past 20 years, there has not been an especially successful primer for new players. And to be honest, I'm not sure they will be successful this time around either. Here's hoping I'm wrong ...</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Slander, post: 4302006, member: 1593"] Has there been any other confirmation of the last comment from that post? : [i]"WOTC has let us retailers know that the launch of 4E is aimed at veteran gamers. New players will be targeted in a separate marketing campaign in the fall, likely coinciding with the new starter game in November."[/i] Having the intro primer come later may not be a bad thing. Assuming the primer doesn't have [i]different[/i] rules, only [i]less[/i] rules, I think it makes sense to have a strong base of happy veterans players available with whom new players can game. In this day and age, I personally think large majority of new players are going to come to the game through the veterans, whether directly ("Hey, guy, you wanna try out this new game") or vicariously (through reviews and comments). I'd think only a small portion of new players would arrive by browsing the shelves at B&N, seeing the PHB cover and thinking "Hmm, this looks interesting. Let me try this." In this context, positive word-of-mouth buzz is worth far more than any artificial marketing buzz they could pay for. Therefore, the goal of the initial release was to get a respectable, happy veteran player base which could generate that buzz. If the PHB was a stripped down version of its current form, I think a lot more of the "veterans" would have been PO-ed. As it is, there are already complaints from some veterans of DnD being "dumbed down" or what have you. My personal observation has been there is more positive buzz than negative (for whatever that's worth), which may not have been the case with an even more simplified version. In that respect, the release was a success. But, and this is a big but, they [b]have[/b] to deliver on a simplified, accessable, and [i]compatible[/i] primer (no "one-off" rules in the primer that don't apply to the real game). And Jeff is right, in the past 20 years, there has not been an especially successful primer for new players. And to be honest, I'm not sure they will be successful this time around either. Here's hoping I'm wrong ... [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Pramas on 4E and New Gamers
Top