Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="BryonD" data-source="post: 4146816" data-attributes="member: 957">No I'm not.&nbsp; But you are.Two can play that pointless game.Again, I did see lots of debate.&nbsp; And *early on* tons of concern.&nbsp; But that changed strongly and steadily as August approached.&nbsp; Just because you can point to the reality that there WAS concern is meaningless.&nbsp; And if you think it matters then you have a total misunderstanding of the point.&nbsp; You can say that at X point in time there was a lot of concern.&nbsp; But if your claim is that the level of acceptance that 4E is achieving as it approaches is anywhere remotely near the level of acceptance that 3E achieved, then your memory has greatly failed you.I think you have his point backwards.There have been complaints in the 4E forum here that ENWorld is the &quot;kindest&quot; place for 4E.&nbsp; There is nothing for 4E that compares to what Eric's page was for 3E.&nbsp;&nbsp; Which is an interesting point of its own.&nbsp; And everywhere else is more harsh.&nbsp; Which is also an interesting point.And, as many others have said, when 3E came along, people were hungry for a new game.&nbsp; That isn't true now.&nbsp; Not by remotely the margin that there was then.&nbsp; But again, two months before release, what I see is vastly beyond what I saw anywhere.&nbsp; Yeah, Eric's board was the pro-3E place and there were some detractors at other places.&nbsp; But it just doesn't compare.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="BryonD, post: 4146816, member: 957"] No I'm not. But you are. Two can play that pointless game. Again, I did see lots of debate. And *early on* tons of concern. But that changed strongly and steadily as August approached. Just because you can point to the reality that there WAS concern is meaningless. And if you think it matters then you have a total misunderstanding of the point. You can say that at X point in time there was a lot of concern. But if your claim is that the level of acceptance that 4E is achieving as it approaches is anywhere remotely near the level of acceptance that 3E achieved, then your memory has greatly failed you. I think you have his point backwards. There have been complaints in the 4E forum here that ENWorld is the "kindest" place for 4E. There is nothing for 4E that compares to what Eric's page was for 3E. Which is an interesting point of its own. And everywhere else is more harsh. Which is also an interesting point. And, as many others have said, when 3E came along, people were hungry for a new game. That isn't true now. Not by remotely the margin that there was then. But again, two months before release, what I see is vastly beyond what I saw anywhere. Yeah, Eric's board was the pro-3E place and there were some detractors at other places. But it just doesn't compare. [/QUOTE]

Verification