Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Voadam" data-source="post: 4151565" data-attributes="member: 2209"><img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f615.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":confused:" title="Confused    :confused:"  data-smilie="5"data-shortname=":confused:" /> Ptolus is a setting city sourcebook with a bit of an expanded world Campaign Setting, though also set up to be able to be inserted into other D&D campaign settings. It competes to an extent with WotC's Waterdeep, Stormreach, and Sharn, though a campaign can have multiple detailed fantasy cities in one game.It is not a dedicated line that can fill out all gaming material. You still need a full set of D&D rules. You could play a game with nothing but the core rules and Ptolus, just like you could with core rules and nothing but the Forgotten Realms Campaign Setting or Eberron Campaign Setting or even statless non-OGL Freeport or the Illustrated Encyclopedia of the World of Warhammer.I disagree that it is clear Ptolus damages WotC.The question here is, is it better for WotC if consumers are able to buy more NonWotC resources to use in a D&D game?</blockquote>