Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
PrC’s, one at a time or for dipping?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Nonlethal Force" data-source="post: 3436649" data-attributes="member: 35788"><p>Honestly, I think it is far easier to create a game where the characters don't need to be optimized to have fun than to enforce rules that prevent having fun. YMMV, of course.</p><p></p><p>Many of the people that post in the rules forum are optimizers by default. They are interested in the best damage build, or the best AC build, or whatever. And that's cool. I read through the forum because once and a while I like the academic challenge of character optimization.</p><p></p><p>However, I never put an optimized character into play. I don't enjoy playing a character that spent their whole life doing X really well and most other things sub-par. Its okay for some, but not for me.</p><p></p><p>In practice, I found that teaching players to focus on the RP and not combat is the best advice for minimizing optimization (or level-dipping). I don't mind a player saying that they want a level of barbarian because they think the rage ability fits the way they play their character. I do mind a player taking one level of barbarian for some optimization purpose.</p><p></p><p>That's where I'd hang my hat. Are your players dipping for RP purposes or optimization purposes. If RP purposes, then why complain? If for optimization purposes, then change your game so optimization is not important to enjoy the experiance.</p><p></p><p>EDIT: To actually answer your questions, so long as a player has solid RP interests behind a choice for a level ... I let them do what they want with PrCs.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Nonlethal Force, post: 3436649, member: 35788"] Honestly, I think it is far easier to create a game where the characters don't need to be optimized to have fun than to enforce rules that prevent having fun. YMMV, of course. Many of the people that post in the rules forum are optimizers by default. They are interested in the best damage build, or the best AC build, or whatever. And that's cool. I read through the forum because once and a while I like the academic challenge of character optimization. However, I never put an optimized character into play. I don't enjoy playing a character that spent their whole life doing X really well and most other things sub-par. Its okay for some, but not for me. In practice, I found that teaching players to focus on the RP and not combat is the best advice for minimizing optimization (or level-dipping). I don't mind a player saying that they want a level of barbarian because they think the rage ability fits the way they play their character. I do mind a player taking one level of barbarian for some optimization purpose. That's where I'd hang my hat. Are your players dipping for RP purposes or optimization purposes. If RP purposes, then why complain? If for optimization purposes, then change your game so optimization is not important to enjoy the experiance. EDIT: To actually answer your questions, so long as a player has solid RP interests behind a choice for a level ... I let them do what they want with PrCs. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
PrC’s, one at a time or for dipping?
Top