Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Dracandross" data-source="post: 3436858" data-attributes="member: 40392">It's better not to enforce it strictly. And why would PrC be different to any non-core base class. Theres also lots of ways to pick level or two among them. Easiest is fighter, why would any sane player play pure fighter? For skillpoint view theres ranger dip and for rage barbarian and for saves pally all this for ½-1 feats each+extra saves too.If player wants to get few PrCs that match well the concept and won't break your game compared to other players let them. I had elemental savant once and I planned to leave it at lvl 9 (3e version) because last level didn't offer +spells (lvl 4 for 3.5e then of course). For wiz spells are everything, it was just for style. And I had it planned that I'd go for loremaster. It suited well my chars style and was not powergaming to its fullest at least. Enforcing rule would lead to fewer options as there is lots of PrCs that really are not worth it for full levels. Or styles that won't be too good even with few PrCs like wiz/spellsword 1/EK isn't.Also if you state it is strict theres no way to leave PrC because of roleplay effects.-Dracandross</blockquote>