Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
PrC’s, one at a time or for dipping?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="wayne62682" data-source="post: 3440935" data-attributes="member: 40455"><p>Depending on your group, it wouldn't slow down so much as annoy players. The initial idea of PrCs might have been to allow for specialized organizations, but they've evolved (for good or ill is not the subject of debate) into being akin to d20 Modern's "Advanced Classes" concept where you mix and match them for the abilities granted in order to better fulfill your character's "vision". There's nothing wrong with either method.</p><p></p><p>I see that most of the arguments against PrC-dipping (any dipping in general, in fact) comes from two schools of thought: One that PrCs are tied to organizations/should be special groups (Elite soldiers, SWAT teams, Special Forces and the like), and Two that a class is a profession instead of a package. I disagree with both of these viewpoints and I find nothing wrong with dipping into PrCs provided the requirements are met; requiring anything more than that is needless overhead in my opinion.</p><p></p><p>It's also my belief that PrCs <strong>should</strong> be better than a base class since you: A) have to meet requirements (usually involving sub-par feat choices), and B) Can usually take a PrC no earlier than fifth or sixth level, which is roughly one-quarter of a normal game's lifespan; If you're going to waste 1/4 of the game before being able to realize your "true potential" (i.e. your character vision/concept), you had <strong>better</strong> get something good in return for it.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="wayne62682, post: 3440935, member: 40455"] Depending on your group, it wouldn't slow down so much as annoy players. The initial idea of PrCs might have been to allow for specialized organizations, but they've evolved (for good or ill is not the subject of debate) into being akin to d20 Modern's "Advanced Classes" concept where you mix and match them for the abilities granted in order to better fulfill your character's "vision". There's nothing wrong with either method. I see that most of the arguments against PrC-dipping (any dipping in general, in fact) comes from two schools of thought: One that PrCs are tied to organizations/should be special groups (Elite soldiers, SWAT teams, Special Forces and the like), and Two that a class is a profession instead of a package. I disagree with both of these viewpoints and I find nothing wrong with dipping into PrCs provided the requirements are met; requiring anything more than that is needless overhead in my opinion. It's also my belief that PrCs [b]should[/b] be better than a base class since you: A) have to meet requirements (usually involving sub-par feat choices), and B) Can usually take a PrC no earlier than fifth or sixth level, which is roughly one-quarter of a normal game's lifespan; If you're going to waste 1/4 of the game before being able to realize your "true potential" (i.e. your character vision/concept), you had [b]better[/b] get something good in return for it. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
PrC’s, one at a time or for dipping?
Top