Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
PrC’s, one at a time or for dipping?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Mistwell" data-source="post: 3442359" data-attributes="member: 2525"><p>You made a claim that WOTC has changed their approach to prestige classes, and reduced the focus on organizations. We are asking you to back up that claim. </p><p></p><p>Generally speaking, if you are "throwing a bone" to someone, the implication is that you spend very little time on that thing, and do so in a perfunctory way. That is not what we are seeing however. In fact, we are seeing the opposite happening in the more recent books. More time is spent describing the organizations and fleshing them out, and in fact the prestige class details themselves seem more perfunctory than their associated organizations (when they are associated with an organization). </p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Space is the primary resource every publisher has in their books. It's THE premium. It translates in a direct way into money spent, and money made.</p><p></p><p>More space in that book is devoted to the Daggerspell Guardians than to either of the particular prestige classes you are mentioning (pg. 31, part of pg. 32, pg. 36, pg 167, 168, 169). In addition, the beginning part and adaptation part for both classes state plainly that the classes are members of an organization, which you are free to change as you see fit. But the default is that they are members of that organization, an organization that is part of the core campaign setting of this game, and well detailed in this book.</p><p></p><p>I understand that you feel that leaving out the single line in the requirements section about the organization somehow represents a change, but I think the evidence of just how much detail and time and resources they spent to focus on the organization is much better evidence that the opposite happened - that WOTC thought the organization itself was a key part of the concept, and important to them. Indeed, it's more detail and focus on the organization that is offered to such organizations in the earlier books by WOTC, and in the DMG where the concept is first introduced.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Fair enough. I suspect you disagree with this statement in the DMG:</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Mistwell, post: 3442359, member: 2525"] You made a claim that WOTC has changed their approach to prestige classes, and reduced the focus on organizations. We are asking you to back up that claim. Generally speaking, if you are "throwing a bone" to someone, the implication is that you spend very little time on that thing, and do so in a perfunctory way. That is not what we are seeing however. In fact, we are seeing the opposite happening in the more recent books. More time is spent describing the organizations and fleshing them out, and in fact the prestige class details themselves seem more perfunctory than their associated organizations (when they are associated with an organization). Space is the primary resource every publisher has in their books. It's THE premium. It translates in a direct way into money spent, and money made. More space in that book is devoted to the Daggerspell Guardians than to either of the particular prestige classes you are mentioning (pg. 31, part of pg. 32, pg. 36, pg 167, 168, 169). In addition, the beginning part and adaptation part for both classes state plainly that the classes are members of an organization, which you are free to change as you see fit. But the default is that they are members of that organization, an organization that is part of the core campaign setting of this game, and well detailed in this book. I understand that you feel that leaving out the single line in the requirements section about the organization somehow represents a change, but I think the evidence of just how much detail and time and resources they spent to focus on the organization is much better evidence that the opposite happened - that WOTC thought the organization itself was a key part of the concept, and important to them. Indeed, it's more detail and focus on the organization that is offered to such organizations in the earlier books by WOTC, and in the DMG where the concept is first introduced. Fair enough. I suspect you disagree with this statement in the DMG: [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
PrC’s, one at a time or for dipping?
Top