Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.

Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Mordane76" data-source="post: 748789" data-attributes="member: 7172">I want to respond to this in a nasty way, but that would be childish of me.  This is not the forum to beat the dead horse of role-playing versus roll-playing, nor is is a battleground for a fight to harden the definition of powergaming versus twinking out.  This is a PrC.For those of you who've put out alternatives, I commend you; while you may not agree or like his class, you're willing to put forth some thought on what you'd change.  For those of you who've just said, "Aww, shucks, this is too powerful, and hence it must be bad," I say BOO.  If you don't like it, make a suggestion -- don't just crap on the guy's idea.Rackhir: I'm sorry for busting your chops.  I just don't think the ninja style is a good way to do this.  Think more like a archer-meets highwayman-meets ghostwalker, not stealthy.  I'm trying to think of a good fictional parallel, but I can't come up with one right now.  Maybe more like the comic-book archer Hawkeye if he shot to kill and had a generally dark outlook.Chacal: You might have something there with the good Will Save and the breaking down of ranged BAB.  I think I'd shy away from it, though, because of the extra book-keeping necessary.  While it might not be alot of extra book-keeping, it's still something extra, which can slow down combat and make to-hit calculation one step messier.mmu1: I agree that DWS is a little extreme.  But Assassin is fairly balanced PrC.  Are you saying you think it's broken as well?</blockquote>

Verification