Menu
Home
Post new thread
What's new
Latest activity
Authors
Community
Post new thread
Create wiki page
Community supporters
All threads
Latest threads
Hot threads
New posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Chat/Discord
Podcast
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Post new thread
Create wiki page
Community supporters
All threads
Latest threads
Hot threads
New posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
NOW LIVE FOR 14 DAYS ONLY! --
Archetype Anthology: A Dozen Archetypes for D&D 5th Edition
on Kickstarter! From dual-wielding tempests to planar explorers -- a softcover collection of new archetypes for your 5th Edition game!
log in
or
register
to remove this ad
Home
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
PrCs: Anathema, or just lack of interest? (Pick two!)
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="EzekielRaiden" data-source="post: 7800250" data-attributes="member: 6790260"><p>Well, part of the reason I ask is that there are some actual PrCs that I think are worth porting into 5e. I've seen efforts to do so that tried to make one as some feats (<strong>severely</strong> lackluster ones compared to the inspiration <em>and</em> other 5e feats) and a subclass for a single class and have found it...disappointing, to say the least.</p><p></p><p>As for "mini-class," I'm not sure I entirely agree. Do you really think no one would draw a comparison to PrC rules? It's a small class with possible qualifications (just simple, straightforward ones, not "rigorously prepare everything you do to qualify" ones) that gives up some levels if your main class for focused flavor and alternate benefits. IMO, whatever label we give it, it's doing the same overall thing. It's just cautiously done, keeping very aware of the faults and limitations of prestige classes as they appeared in 3.5e.</p><p></p><p>As an example of one I think could work great: Archmage. It's cool and thematic to give up spell slots in order to get powerful effects, like permanently memorizing two copies of a spell in exchange for two appropriate slots. The original is only 5 levels, and the translated requirements would basically just be "proficiency in Arcana and ability to cast 7th level spells as a bard, wizard, or sorcerer." That's nice and simple, easy to qualify for, and allows someone to pursue a different take on ultimate control of magic (emphasizing how all arcane magic is really the same no matter how you access it...if you learn enough.) Further, because it would only kick in at level 14+, you can definitely balance its features against capstones and high-level single-class features, giving some freedom to be creative and interesting.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="EzekielRaiden, post: 7800250, member: 6790260"] Well, part of the reason I ask is that there are some actual PrCs that I think are worth porting into 5e. I've seen efforts to do so that tried to make one as some feats ([B]severely[/B] lackluster ones compared to the inspiration [I]and[/I] other 5e feats) and a subclass for a single class and have found it...disappointing, to say the least. As for "mini-class," I'm not sure I entirely agree. Do you really think no one would draw a comparison to PrC rules? It's a small class with possible qualifications (just simple, straightforward ones, not "rigorously prepare everything you do to qualify" ones) that gives up some levels if your main class for focused flavor and alternate benefits. IMO, whatever label we give it, it's doing the same overall thing. It's just cautiously done, keeping very aware of the faults and limitations of prestige classes as they appeared in 3.5e. As an example of one I think could work great: Archmage. It's cool and thematic to give up spell slots in order to get powerful effects, like permanently memorizing two copies of a spell in exchange for two appropriate slots. The original is only 5 levels, and the translated requirements would basically just be "proficiency in Arcana and ability to cast 7th level spells as a bard, wizard, or sorcerer." That's nice and simple, easy to qualify for, and allows someone to pursue a different take on ultimate control of magic (emphasizing how all arcane magic is really the same no matter how you access it...if you learn enough.) Further, because it would only kick in at level 14+, you can definitely balance its features against capstones and high-level single-class features, giving some freedom to be creative and interesting. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
PrCs: Anathema, or just lack of interest? (Pick two!)
Top