Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Jhaelen" data-source="post: 4151450" data-attributes="member: 46713">Interesting! It's really amazing how opinions can be different:I think ECS was the best campaign setting book I've ever read.I also think Sharn was among the worst supplements I ever read (and definitely the worst for 3E).I cannot really decide what the best/worst books were among all the different editions. There's simply too many.I know that I love my 1E Fiend Folio and that was utterly fascinated by the 1E Deities & Demigods (mainly the Mythos section). I thought the [/b]2E Planescape Box[/b] was simply beautiful but also something I was sure I'd never play. The most useful supplement for my favorite setting (Darksun) was City State of Tyr. I am extremely fond of the widely disliked 3E Weapons of Legacy.I don't remember many books that I truly disliked. The 1E Expedition to Barrier Peaks adventure is one of them. Most of the 'classic' D&D adventures are pretty bad, imho. Almost every other rpg system had better adventures to offer back then.From the 3E releases I disliked- Frostburn - So much potential gone to waste - utterly uninspiring!- Dragon Magic - A hodgepodge of useless stuff in a dozen of only superficially different flavours- Complete Psion - I cannot express how I HATED that thing!</blockquote>