Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Million Dollar TTRPG Crowdfunders
Most Anticipated Tabletop RPGs Of The Year
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Pre-American industrial "evolution"
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="fusangite" data-source="post: 1904219" data-attributes="member: 7240"><p>So what technologies did the Mexica employ that other American civilizations did not?</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Actually, you appeared, from my reading, to be stating that Germanic languages were better for communicating technological information than Romance languages were because they were word-building languages. If I've been successful in disabusing you of that notion, I'm pleased. (The danger of that theory is it places Turkic language as the most technically useful.)</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Also, I think the Charlemagne quote you are using is either apocryphal or mistranslated because French and German were acknowledged for the first time as separate languages 29 years after his death. Also, according to his capitularies, it is very clear that God is supposed to be addressed only in Latin. <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f609.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=";)" title="Wink ;)" data-smilie="2"data-shortname=";)" /></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>I heard a very compelling argument that the Inca Quipu system was actually the language closest to making that incredible breakthrough. [For more on this, I'll want to be prompted so as to not make the hijack of the thread complete.] Regardless of whether your language is phonetic (like Latin), syllabic (like Arabic) or symbolic (like Chinese) you still have to map your language from sound or meaning codes into numeric codes. I don't think any of the systems is more or less conducive to such mapping. While one could argue that by having very few codes, we are closer to binary and are only removed from it by a power of 5, one could equally argue that the need to convert language into some simplified, numeric construct would be more obvious to an individual operating within the highly complex Chinese system of thousands of characters.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="fusangite, post: 1904219, member: 7240"] So what technologies did the Mexica employ that other American civilizations did not? Actually, you appeared, from my reading, to be stating that Germanic languages were better for communicating technological information than Romance languages were because they were word-building languages. If I've been successful in disabusing you of that notion, I'm pleased. (The danger of that theory is it places Turkic language as the most technically useful.) Also, I think the Charlemagne quote you are using is either apocryphal or mistranslated because French and German were acknowledged for the first time as separate languages 29 years after his death. Also, according to his capitularies, it is very clear that God is supposed to be addressed only in Latin. ;) I heard a very compelling argument that the Inca Quipu system was actually the language closest to making that incredible breakthrough. [For more on this, I'll want to be prompted so as to not make the hijack of the thread complete.] Regardless of whether your language is phonetic (like Latin), syllabic (like Arabic) or symbolic (like Chinese) you still have to map your language from sound or meaning codes into numeric codes. I don't think any of the systems is more or less conducive to such mapping. While one could argue that by having very few codes, we are closer to binary and are only removed from it by a power of 5, one could equally argue that the need to convert language into some simplified, numeric construct would be more obvious to an individual operating within the highly complex Chinese system of thousands of characters. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Pre-American industrial "evolution"
Top