Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="jgsugden" data-source="post: 7087399" data-attributes="member: 2629">If you&nbsp; read my full response, I did suggest a balanced alternative in the last line of my response.&nbsp; If you look at prior editions, expanding the 'critical range' was one of the most abused elements in the game.&nbsp; I suggested not going down this road because there are some things best left untouched.&nbsp; For example, if I asked for people to provide suggestions for how we could have a feat that allowed my PC to kill any monster with a glance with no attack roll or save required, there wouldn't really be any constructive or positive suggestions on how to implement such a feat that matched my goals.&nbsp; The best advice would be, &quot;No.&nbsp; Just no.&quot;&nbsp; While this proposal is not that gross, many of us feel it is beyond the line where constructive suggestions to implement the initial stated goal are not going to result in a positive play experience.&nbsp; You're barking up the wrong tree.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="jgsugden, post: 7087399, member: 2629"] If you read my full response, I did suggest a balanced alternative in the last line of my response. If you look at prior editions, expanding the 'critical range' was one of the most abused elements in the game. I suggested not going down this road because there are some things best left untouched. For example, if I asked for people to provide suggestions for how we could have a feat that allowed my PC to kill any monster with a glance with no attack roll or save required, there wouldn't really be any constructive or positive suggestions on how to implement such a feat that matched my goals. The best advice would be, "No. Just no." While this proposal is not that gross, many of us feel it is beyond the line where constructive suggestions to implement the initial stated goal are not going to result in a positive play experience. You're barking up the wrong tree. [/QUOTE]

Verification