Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Rocket your D&D 5E and Level Up: Advanced 5E games into space! Alpha Star Magazine Is Launching... Right Now!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Predicting the joy of Paragon tier
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="TwoSix" data-source="post: 4197903" data-attributes="member: 205"><p>What we know:</p><p></p><p> <img src="http://www.enworld.org/forum/images/smilies/1.gif" class="smilie" loading="lazy" alt=":1:" title="One :1:" data-shortname=":1:" /> In R&C, the current design plan was 12 Paragon Paths, each intended for 2 classes.</p><p></p><p> <img src="http://www.enworld.org/forum/images/smilies/2.gif" class="smilie" loading="lazy" alt=":2:" title="Two :2:" data-shortname=":2:" /> The current PHB, as per WotC_Miko, contains over 30 Paragon Paths.</p><p></p><p> <img src="http://www.enworld.org/forum/images/smilies/3.gif" class="smilie" loading="lazy" alt=":3:" title="Three :3:" data-shortname=":3:" /> From the paragon paths excerpt, each PP has a prerequisite of a singular class.</p><p></p><p> <img src="http://www.enworld.org/forum/images/smilies/4.gif" class="smilie" loading="lazy" alt=":4:" title="Four :4:" data-shortname=":4:" /> From the multiclassing excerpt, taking a multiclass feat will qualify you for all PPs with that class as a prerequisite. What that means, simply, is that any base class can qualify for any PP.</p><p></p><p> <img src="http://www.enworld.org/forum/images/smilies/5.gif" class="smilie" loading="lazy" alt=":5:" title="Five :5:" data-shortname=":5:" /> Base classes will be released primarily in the PHBX series. PPs will be released in the PHBX series, as well as the <Source> Power series, and possibly other avenues.</p><p></p><p>What I think:</p><p></p><p> <img src="http://www.enworld.org/forum/images/smilies/1.gif" class="smilie" loading="lazy" alt=":1:" title="One :1:" data-shortname=":1:" /> PPs only have 6 powers, which makes them easy to design and develop. Limiting them to one class makes design easier than making them fit two distinct classes.</p><p></p><p> <img src="http://www.enworld.org/forum/images/smilies/2.gif" class="smilie" loading="lazy" alt=":2:" title="Two :2:" data-shortname=":2:" /> The multiclass design evolved with the Paragon Path change. Why? I think that the change to Paragon Path requirements was made with the intention that Paragon Paths would then become the new character identifier, just as PrCs are in 3e. Multiclassing was done to allow base classes to be customized into whatever Paragon Path the player desired.</p><p></p><p> <img src="http://www.enworld.org/forum/images/smilies/3.gif" class="smilie" loading="lazy" alt=":3:" title="Three :3:" data-shortname=":3:" /> This increases the number of overall character definitions. While we know that feat and power choices are important, character design will be based around 3 factors: Race, Base Class, and intended/taken Paragon Path. With the R&C system, there were only 24 BC/PP combinations. With the current system, assuming 30 PPs and the allowance of other base classes as PP options, there are 296.</p><p></p><p>Therefore:</p><p></p><p>11th level will be the 2nd most common starting point after 1st, and will become even more common as the game evolves. The reason will be that the number of PPs will increase more quickly than the number of base classes, and players will be eager to try the new options. </p><p></p><p>Thoughts?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="TwoSix, post: 4197903, member: 205"] What we know: :1: In R&C, the current design plan was 12 Paragon Paths, each intended for 2 classes. :2: The current PHB, as per WotC_Miko, contains over 30 Paragon Paths. :3: From the paragon paths excerpt, each PP has a prerequisite of a singular class. :4: From the multiclassing excerpt, taking a multiclass feat will qualify you for all PPs with that class as a prerequisite. What that means, simply, is that any base class can qualify for any PP. :5: Base classes will be released primarily in the PHBX series. PPs will be released in the PHBX series, as well as the <Source> Power series, and possibly other avenues. What I think: :1: PPs only have 6 powers, which makes them easy to design and develop. Limiting them to one class makes design easier than making them fit two distinct classes. :2: The multiclass design evolved with the Paragon Path change. Why? I think that the change to Paragon Path requirements was made with the intention that Paragon Paths would then become the new character identifier, just as PrCs are in 3e. Multiclassing was done to allow base classes to be customized into whatever Paragon Path the player desired. :3: This increases the number of overall character definitions. While we know that feat and power choices are important, character design will be based around 3 factors: Race, Base Class, and intended/taken Paragon Path. With the R&C system, there were only 24 BC/PP combinations. With the current system, assuming 30 PPs and the allowance of other base classes as PP options, there are 296. Therefore: 11th level will be the 2nd most common starting point after 1st, and will become even more common as the game evolves. The reason will be that the number of PPs will increase more quickly than the number of base classes, and players will be eager to try the new options. Thoughts? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Predicting the joy of Paragon tier
Top