Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Preparing Hellknight Hill
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="!DWolf" data-source="post: 8109765" data-attributes="member: 7026314"><p>Note: this was written haphazardly, stream of consciousness style; please forgive any errors.</p><p></p><p><strong>Overall:</strong></p><ul> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">The structure of the plot pretty well matches Guy Sclanders five step method (find out plot, travel to plot, find out plot is not plot, travel to new plot, kill plot)</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">The author deliberately paid attention to the pacing: breaking up ‘combat encounters’ with ‘social encounters’ and decision points. The quotes are because encounters aren’t really social or combat of course, those are descriptions of how they can be resolved.</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">There are some major flaws with the module, some of which are editing mistakes, and some of which are proof that writers have no sense of time or scale. Examples: the keep should probably be 10 miles away (as listed on p. 64) and not 1 mile (as listed on p. 12), the fountain circle/monument circle is an inconstant mess of descriptions (does it have wells, watertowers, or pumps? Is there a statue or not?), and the timeline makes no sense (Warble really waited a whole month instead of walking 15 minutes/3 hours?). Fortunately, these are all easily fixable.</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">I am going to use milestone leveling (since I add stuff, and I don’t want players grinding in dungeons because that is unfun).</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">The theme of the module is Building a Home on the Ruins of the Past. To really work with that, I am going to make sure that the majority of the players have finding the deed to the citadel as their primary motivation.</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">The mood/tone of the module is Reflecting on Faded Glory (think MGS4 when you return to Shadow Moses, or Shadow of the Colossus, or any number of urban exploration videos in decaying and abandoned buildings). When I run it I will probably add some gothic elements as well (more ornate descriptions, unknown undercurrents of malice, stronger scenery descriptions, heavy foreshadowing) and really play up the folk horror aspect of</li> </ul><p><strong>Chapter 1:</strong></p><ul> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">The idea of the Call for Heroes is fantastic but it’s potential is wasted here as there is only one adventure being offered – I understand why (they don’t want to split the party of new players up) but I am definitely going to add more (and I am totally going to split the party up – a split party is a fun party!). All the quests will lead to the same place of course.</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">Everyone just says they saw Calmont do it and he went that way. I would prefer to run an investigation here. I will probably use exploration mode with one hour turns (to keep up the time pressure) and a simple five node investigation.</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">I will probably use a variation of the urban crawl I am working on. But all the encounters will be flavor encounters – but with a bit of an undercurrent of the towns weirdness in them (idealization of the founder, doting on adventurers, etc.)</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">This isn’t in chapter 1, but Breachill is pretty competently done (if one ignores fountain/monument circle inconsistencies) and it should be really easy to make a rumor table and multiple quests. I am also probably going to make a bounty board – I can use this to foreshadow the bloody blades, the warg, the dead adventurers (to really play up the folk horror aspect of the Call for Heroes), etc.</li> </ul><p><strong>Chapter 2:</strong></p><ul> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">There are a lot of entrances and areas of the dungeon may be skipped entirely. Obviously this is a non-linear dungeon.</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">Dead bodies signal danger in this module.</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">For anyone still saying that the author didn’t intend for the characters to use stealth and strategy to tackle this dungeon and instead meant it to be a series of stand-up fights, have this little quote (from A10): “However, he’s not very stealthy, so his presence is more likely to cause enemies to find the group, possibly combining multiple smaller encounters into one more difficult fight.” Which clearly indicates that the author is expecting the characters to be using at least some stealth and strategy.</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">There are two encounters that don’t have any foreshadowing and attack out of nowhere: the giant bat and the spider swarms. Everything else has at least some indication of the danger. These encounters were probably added for XP.</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">Non-combat resolutions are clearly intended as possible for most of the encounters (and many are explicitly spelled out, including the very first encounter listed in the dungeon (A1) which likely gets you allies to help with the dungeon).</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">Creatures are not presented as video-game attack monsters (with a couple exceptions): some creatures don’t attack even if hostile, some are explicitly called out as retreating when wounded, and many have their motivates explained. Notably the boss of this chapter can be talked/intimidated into surrendering and it explicitly says that in the module.</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">Yoletcha took the monster under-the-bed description in the bestiary way too literally.</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">This chapter should be very easy to pace because of the mix of ‘social’ and ‘combat’ encounters (again with the scare quotes), and I will probably run most combats (except A12) as theater of the mind. The scene framing should be very non-aggressive to give a real sense of exploration (and to make it easier to run a split party of course).</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">I am tempted to build a restock mechanism for cleared areas, but my players are very likely to finish the dungeon on the first pass, so I am not going to bother. Likewise a random encounter table is probably overkill.</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">The trap location makes sense (in a little used passage behind a secret door), but it still feels like a gotcha type trap to me. Easily fixed though: when Alak entered (see area A8), he avoided the trap (it has to be manually reset), so he knows its there and how to bypass it and he probably left tracks and signs of how he did it because he is not very stealthy (as established in A10).</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">This module was written before the GMG but the research subsystem slots into it perfectly, so I am going to put it into the module in place of all the books on Hellknight lore. The higher end will have things like the necromantic ward.</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">Beginning to look at the later steps in the process, a lot of work has been done for me: lots of encounters are decently foreshadowed, creatures have motivations and don’t needlessly fight to the death, etc.</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">I love the lighting in this chapter. Sunlight streaming through holes in the walls. If I could (I play in a game store), I would set up the rooms lighting on a switch I controlled and adjust the lighting dynamically as we played.</li> </ul><p>An aside here on scene framing: So I didn’t really talk about it this in the other threads but modules really benefit from using the correct scene framing. In a module like this (inspired by old-school dungeon crawls a with a good emphasis on encounter fundamentals) if you just use the cut-to-the-combat scene framing in which players are dumped into combat with little choice to do anything else, then you will not get good results (for one thing you will absolutely kill any sort of tension regarding exploring the ruins). A more gentle scene framing (that is framing the scenes farther back from the initiation/resolution of the conflict) so the players have more agency and can exercise more skill will get a much better result here – provided you can pace it correctly. Which probably why the module seems to put so much work into actually pacing things decently.</p><p></p><p><strong>Chapter 3:</strong></p><ul> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">This area is non-linear but less so than the ground floor.</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">The gelatinous cube is foreshadowed heavily with slime trails.</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">The kobolds are adorable</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">The goblins tell about the bear and give the players a map of the northern area, letting them pretty much head right to it. Let me quote: “You can run a combat between the bear and cultists as you see fit, or simply assume that the bear kills half of the cultists in the north wing before it is itself defeated.”</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">The entire southern half of the complex (B12-B17) can be bypassed by wearing hellknight regalia and/or cleared by destroying the necromantic ward.</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">From all the above it is very clear to me that the author intended the PCs to take a stealthy, asymmetrical combat approach to this level as well.</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">This level will be much harder to pace as each area (north, south, east) sort of has a theme and there is no incentive to split up here because of the more linear nature of the layout. There are some breakups (interrogating the cultists in the northern section for example) but it is more likely to have three or more combats in a row, depending on how players approach it. They are also likely to have multiple allies (Big Bumble, the kobolds, Alak). I will have to see how it turns out in play but if the players have a lot of allies, I am tempted to set a quicker pace in the northern portion of the dungeon (through more aggressive scene framing and more reactive allies/monsters), to highlight the chaos and the loss of control with so many allies with minds of their own bring. Then for the southern portion, I will slow it down to empathize the puzzle nature of that portion of the dungeon.</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">I liked chapter 2 much more as a dungeon, though this chapter does have it’s high points.</li> </ul><p><strong>Chapter 4:</strong></p><ul> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">The investigation is rather cursory. I will add more to it to flesh it out and hopefully enhance the folk horror narrative (Voz’s copy of breachhills history, suitably adjusted, should really help here).</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">The bloody blades and their camp (C1-C5) is clearly a fortress assault scenario with reactive opponents and I don’t know how people are reading it otherwise. It’s interesting that unlike later scenarios, this one is survivable if the PCs just attempt a straight out attack.</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">Balka attempts to surrender if seriously injured.</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">Renali is a social encounter meant to be the PCs ally.</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">I have serious problems with Ralldar. This is a TPK waiting to happen: a very high level creature pretending to be much weaker creature with potentially nothing to indicate otherwise until things go bad. At the very least the local goblins should have legends on this guy right? I will definitely put them in the module to foreshadow more: maybe Warbell is worried the Ralldar has returned? Maybe Voz has a warning as well (in her notes if not taken allive). At the very least I can do the classic horror rpg things in describing him/the room and hope the characters pick up on it.</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">The last part of the module (roughly C6-D10), is very linear. This might not be a bad thing as it is getting towards the end. The pacing should be relatively easy to maintain here since there is a good mix of ‘combat’ and ‘social’ encounters.</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">I don’t think that Voz actually did anything illegal? That might be an interesting approach to take swapping out the fight with a debate (or having a debate followed by a fight). Another interesting avenue would be them having them drag her to town – only for her to pay a fine and go free.</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">The transition from C to D could be fleshed out a lot more if desired. I’m thinking a cave network with a safe path marked out by voz (using the sigil spell) so you have these little signs in the darkness indicating a safe path.</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">Voz, either in person or through writings could provide excellent foreshadowing of some of the dangers ahead (or behind if they took the southern branch and ignored the northern).</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">She might also perform a retreat into a dangerous area instead of sticking around to fight if she thinks she is losing.</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">I’m liking the setup with Voz – a lot of options. Voz is a villain with plans and agency and I am worried that the actual climatic boss fight (who’s plan is to wait to be rescued because he is stuck in a hole) will feel anticlimactic (and the doorwarden is definitively going to feel anticlimactic).</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">There are a lot of dead adventurers here. I am definitely going to add rumors about their fates (all wildly inaccurate) to the rumor tables. Perhaps their friends and loved ones also posted bounties.</li> </ul></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="!DWolf, post: 8109765, member: 7026314"] Note: this was written haphazardly, stream of consciousness style; please forgive any errors. [B]Overall:[/B] [LIST] [*]The structure of the plot pretty well matches Guy Sclanders five step method (find out plot, travel to plot, find out plot is not plot, travel to new plot, kill plot) [*]The author deliberately paid attention to the pacing: breaking up ‘combat encounters’ with ‘social encounters’ and decision points. The quotes are because encounters aren’t really social or combat of course, those are descriptions of how they can be resolved. [*]There are some major flaws with the module, some of which are editing mistakes, and some of which are proof that writers have no sense of time or scale. Examples: the keep should probably be 10 miles away (as listed on p. 64) and not 1 mile (as listed on p. 12), the fountain circle/monument circle is an inconstant mess of descriptions (does it have wells, watertowers, or pumps? Is there a statue or not?), and the timeline makes no sense (Warble really waited a whole month instead of walking 15 minutes/3 hours?). Fortunately, these are all easily fixable. [*]I am going to use milestone leveling (since I add stuff, and I don’t want players grinding in dungeons because that is unfun). [*]The theme of the module is Building a Home on the Ruins of the Past. To really work with that, I am going to make sure that the majority of the players have finding the deed to the citadel as their primary motivation. [*]The mood/tone of the module is Reflecting on Faded Glory (think MGS4 when you return to Shadow Moses, or Shadow of the Colossus, or any number of urban exploration videos in decaying and abandoned buildings). When I run it I will probably add some gothic elements as well (more ornate descriptions, unknown undercurrents of malice, stronger scenery descriptions, heavy foreshadowing) and really play up the folk horror aspect of [/list] [B]Chapter 1:[/B] [LIST] [*]The idea of the Call for Heroes is fantastic but it’s potential is wasted here as there is only one adventure being offered – I understand why (they don’t want to split the party of new players up) but I am definitely going to add more (and I am totally going to split the party up – a split party is a fun party!). All the quests will lead to the same place of course. [*]Everyone just says they saw Calmont do it and he went that way. I would prefer to run an investigation here. I will probably use exploration mode with one hour turns (to keep up the time pressure) and a simple five node investigation. [*]I will probably use a variation of the urban crawl I am working on. But all the encounters will be flavor encounters – but with a bit of an undercurrent of the towns weirdness in them (idealization of the founder, doting on adventurers, etc.) [*]This isn’t in chapter 1, but Breachill is pretty competently done (if one ignores fountain/monument circle inconsistencies) and it should be really easy to make a rumor table and multiple quests. I am also probably going to make a bounty board – I can use this to foreshadow the bloody blades, the warg, the dead adventurers (to really play up the folk horror aspect of the Call for Heroes), etc. [/LIST] [B]Chapter 2:[/B] [LIST] [*]There are a lot of entrances and areas of the dungeon may be skipped entirely. Obviously this is a non-linear dungeon. [*]Dead bodies signal danger in this module. [*]For anyone still saying that the author didn’t intend for the characters to use stealth and strategy to tackle this dungeon and instead meant it to be a series of stand-up fights, have this little quote (from A10): “However, he’s not very stealthy, so his presence is more likely to cause enemies to find the group, possibly combining multiple smaller encounters into one more difficult fight.” Which clearly indicates that the author is expecting the characters to be using at least some stealth and strategy. [*]There are two encounters that don’t have any foreshadowing and attack out of nowhere: the giant bat and the spider swarms. Everything else has at least some indication of the danger. These encounters were probably added for XP. [*]Non-combat resolutions are clearly intended as possible for most of the encounters (and many are explicitly spelled out, including the very first encounter listed in the dungeon (A1) which likely gets you allies to help with the dungeon). [*]Creatures are not presented as video-game attack monsters (with a couple exceptions): some creatures don’t attack even if hostile, some are explicitly called out as retreating when wounded, and many have their motivates explained. Notably the boss of this chapter can be talked/intimidated into surrendering and it explicitly says that in the module. [*]Yoletcha took the monster under-the-bed description in the bestiary way too literally. [*]This chapter should be very easy to pace because of the mix of ‘social’ and ‘combat’ encounters (again with the scare quotes), and I will probably run most combats (except A12) as theater of the mind. The scene framing should be very non-aggressive to give a real sense of exploration (and to make it easier to run a split party of course). [*]I am tempted to build a restock mechanism for cleared areas, but my players are very likely to finish the dungeon on the first pass, so I am not going to bother. Likewise a random encounter table is probably overkill. [*]The trap location makes sense (in a little used passage behind a secret door), but it still feels like a gotcha type trap to me. Easily fixed though: when Alak entered (see area A8), he avoided the trap (it has to be manually reset), so he knows its there and how to bypass it and he probably left tracks and signs of how he did it because he is not very stealthy (as established in A10). [*]This module was written before the GMG but the research subsystem slots into it perfectly, so I am going to put it into the module in place of all the books on Hellknight lore. The higher end will have things like the necromantic ward. [*]Beginning to look at the later steps in the process, a lot of work has been done for me: lots of encounters are decently foreshadowed, creatures have motivations and don’t needlessly fight to the death, etc. [*]I love the lighting in this chapter. Sunlight streaming through holes in the walls. If I could (I play in a game store), I would set up the rooms lighting on a switch I controlled and adjust the lighting dynamically as we played. [/LIST] An aside here on scene framing: So I didn’t really talk about it this in the other threads but modules really benefit from using the correct scene framing. In a module like this (inspired by old-school dungeon crawls a with a good emphasis on encounter fundamentals) if you just use the cut-to-the-combat scene framing in which players are dumped into combat with little choice to do anything else, then you will not get good results (for one thing you will absolutely kill any sort of tension regarding exploring the ruins). A more gentle scene framing (that is framing the scenes farther back from the initiation/resolution of the conflict) so the players have more agency and can exercise more skill will get a much better result here – provided you can pace it correctly. Which probably why the module seems to put so much work into actually pacing things decently. [B]Chapter 3:[/B] [LIST] [*]This area is non-linear but less so than the ground floor. [*]The gelatinous cube is foreshadowed heavily with slime trails. [*]The kobolds are adorable [*]The goblins tell about the bear and give the players a map of the northern area, letting them pretty much head right to it. Let me quote: “You can run a combat between the bear and cultists as you see fit, or simply assume that the bear kills half of the cultists in the north wing before it is itself defeated.” [*]The entire southern half of the complex (B12-B17) can be bypassed by wearing hellknight regalia and/or cleared by destroying the necromantic ward. [*]From all the above it is very clear to me that the author intended the PCs to take a stealthy, asymmetrical combat approach to this level as well. [*]This level will be much harder to pace as each area (north, south, east) sort of has a theme and there is no incentive to split up here because of the more linear nature of the layout. There are some breakups (interrogating the cultists in the northern section for example) but it is more likely to have three or more combats in a row, depending on how players approach it. They are also likely to have multiple allies (Big Bumble, the kobolds, Alak). I will have to see how it turns out in play but if the players have a lot of allies, I am tempted to set a quicker pace in the northern portion of the dungeon (through more aggressive scene framing and more reactive allies/monsters), to highlight the chaos and the loss of control with so many allies with minds of their own bring. Then for the southern portion, I will slow it down to empathize the puzzle nature of that portion of the dungeon. [*]I liked chapter 2 much more as a dungeon, though this chapter does have it’s high points. [/LIST] [b]Chapter 4:[/b] [LIST] [*]The investigation is rather cursory. I will add more to it to flesh it out and hopefully enhance the folk horror narrative (Voz’s copy of breachhills history, suitably adjusted, should really help here). [*]The bloody blades and their camp (C1-C5) is clearly a fortress assault scenario with reactive opponents and I don’t know how people are reading it otherwise. It’s interesting that unlike later scenarios, this one is survivable if the PCs just attempt a straight out attack. [*]Balka attempts to surrender if seriously injured. [*]Renali is a social encounter meant to be the PCs ally. [*]I have serious problems with Ralldar. This is a TPK waiting to happen: a very high level creature pretending to be much weaker creature with potentially nothing to indicate otherwise until things go bad. At the very least the local goblins should have legends on this guy right? I will definitely put them in the module to foreshadow more: maybe Warbell is worried the Ralldar has returned? Maybe Voz has a warning as well (in her notes if not taken allive). At the very least I can do the classic horror rpg things in describing him/the room and hope the characters pick up on it. [*]The last part of the module (roughly C6-D10), is very linear. This might not be a bad thing as it is getting towards the end. The pacing should be relatively easy to maintain here since there is a good mix of ‘combat’ and ‘social’ encounters. [*]I don’t think that Voz actually did anything illegal? That might be an interesting approach to take swapping out the fight with a debate (or having a debate followed by a fight). Another interesting avenue would be them having them drag her to town – only for her to pay a fine and go free. [*]The transition from C to D could be fleshed out a lot more if desired. I’m thinking a cave network with a safe path marked out by voz (using the sigil spell) so you have these little signs in the darkness indicating a safe path. [*]Voz, either in person or through writings could provide excellent foreshadowing of some of the dangers ahead (or behind if they took the southern branch and ignored the northern). [*]She might also perform a retreat into a dangerous area instead of sticking around to fight if she thinks she is losing. [*]I’m liking the setup with Voz – a lot of options. Voz is a villain with plans and agency and I am worried that the actual climatic boss fight (who’s plan is to wait to be rescued because he is stuck in a hole) will feel anticlimactic (and the doorwarden is definitively going to feel anticlimactic). [*]There are a lot of dead adventurers here. I am definitely going to add rumors about their fates (all wildly inaccurate) to the rumor tables. Perhaps their friends and loved ones also posted bounties. [/LIST] [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Preparing Hellknight Hill
Top