Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Conaill" data-source="post: 78955" data-attributes="member: 1264">It's a &quot;fair trade&quot; to let wizards cast three times as many spells? Keep in mind that divine casters have much less flexibility on when they can prepare (&quot;If the character does not stop to pray for spells at the first opportunity, he must wait until the next day to prepare spells.&quot;). Plus they have the same 8 hour Recent Casting Limit to deal with, and they still need to rest 8 hrs to avoid being fatigued (-2 to STR and DEX, can't run or charge).OK, so now I am confused. <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f609.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=";)" title="Wink&nbsp; &nbsp; ;)"&nbsp; data-smilie="2"data-shortname=";)" /> In your previous post you said &quot;I think, by the rules, that option A is probably the most correct one&quot;.I thought it was clear as well. Unfortunately, the votes indicate otherwise: 1 out of 3 voters seem to think it's &quot;obvious&quot; that option A is the correct rule.If we can all agree about one thing, it's that this rule is not as clear as it should be!</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Conaill, post: 78955, member: 1264"] It's a "fair trade" to let wizards cast three times as many spells? Keep in mind that divine casters have much less flexibility on when they can prepare ("[i]If the character does not stop to pray for spells at the first opportunity, he must wait until the next day to prepare spells.[/i]"). Plus they have the same 8 hour Recent Casting Limit to deal with, and they still need to rest 8 hrs to avoid being fatigued (-2 to STR and DEX, can't run or charge). OK, so now [i]I[/i] am confused. ;) In your previous post you said "I think, by the rules, that option A is probably the most correct one". I thought it was clear as well. Unfortunately, the votes indicate otherwise: 1 out of 3 voters seem to think it's "obvious" that option A is the correct rule. If we can all agree about one thing, it's that this rule is not as clear as it should be! [/QUOTE]

Verification