Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Presentaion of Spells: To Prose or Not To Prose?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Crazy Jerome" data-source="post: 5926764" data-attributes="member: 54877"><p>I'm starting to lean towards stat block + prose, with deliberate redundant information in each. (Where the stat block indicates, the prose may still provide rules information that supplements what will not fit in the block, but would always at least write out most of what the block says already.)</p><p> </p><p>Among other reasons, this will allow them to finally stop splitting the difference on game terms versus in-game terms. Let the block talk about "squares" or (game) "inches" or whatever, with specific keywords with set meanings, etc. Then let the prose part use the in-game terms, whether "feet" or "paces" or being on fire. </p><p> </p><p>Inevitably, there will be discrepancies, where the block is changed from 6 to 5 squares and the prose part still says 30 feet instead of 25. But it would be rather simple to say that by default the block wins on mechanics questions until updated. Then people that want to run on the prose part can do so, ignoring the stat block until such time as they have a rules intention question they want answered enough to bother reading the block. Likewise, people who like running on the block but want to browse the spells to see what they do away from the table can read prose if they want.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Crazy Jerome, post: 5926764, member: 54877"] I'm starting to lean towards stat block + prose, with deliberate redundant information in each. (Where the stat block indicates, the prose may still provide rules information that supplements what will not fit in the block, but would always at least write out most of what the block says already.) Among other reasons, this will allow them to finally stop splitting the difference on game terms versus in-game terms. Let the block talk about "squares" or (game) "inches" or whatever, with specific keywords with set meanings, etc. Then let the prose part use the in-game terms, whether "feet" or "paces" or being on fire. Inevitably, there will be discrepancies, where the block is changed from 6 to 5 squares and the prose part still says 30 feet instead of 25. But it would be rather simple to say that by default the block wins on mechanics questions until updated. Then people that want to run on the prose part can do so, ignoring the stat block until such time as they have a rules intention question they want answered enough to bother reading the block. Likewise, people who like running on the block but want to browse the spells to see what they do away from the table can read prose if they want. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Presentaion of Spells: To Prose or Not To Prose?
Top