Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
Presentation vs design... vs philosophy
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Arilyn" data-source="post: 7933987" data-attributes="member: 6816042"><p>I dragged out my 4e books to take a closer look at powers, and yes, while there is lots of shifting, pulling and shoving, there are also a lot of very cool flavourful powers. The monk, for example, is way more interesting than the 5e monk. The game is more fantastical, especially when you add in the other player books. We have characters briefly turning into flights of birds or raining down shards from their bows, at 1st level. </p><p></p><p>I was not a fan of 4e, but taking another look, I think there's a lot there to commend it. Weapon choice is more meaningful. I've always liked the <em>at will, encounter </em>and <em>daily </em>idea, as it is nice and obvious when abilities can be used, and you don't have to rely on short rests. </p><p></p><p>As far as the character sheet being too complicated? You don't need a program. It's just going to be a lot of erasing when you level up. You are going to need power cards, however. No way all those abilities will be easily memorized. But, then again, I use them in 5e too (my own, not going to buy them.) </p><p></p><p>The rules books are not immersive, which is odd because of its more fantastical feel at the table. It's not going to fit in with the typical adventures, we imagine in D&D, but if you want to play a game with mighty heroes, heading for fantastic destinies, who'll have a huge impact on the world, 4e is a good choice. </p><p></p><p>As far as PF2 and 4e? The games don't really play the same. PF2 still feels like PF1. There are some similarities to 4e, but not to the extent that Paizo deliberately chose to copy 4e. I'm not happy with character creation, but playing is smooth and a lot of fun. It feels heavy, which can be an initial turn off, but it doesn't actually play heavy. I think it could use some streamlining, in terms of how skills and feats work, and the monster blocks are still a bit too onerous. </p><p></p><p>We can't know how happy Paizo is with this release. 5e is so far ahead in the market that rating PF by comparing it to 5e won't work. Paizo could be doing the best they ever have financially, and there'd be no way to know. Paizo doesn't need to be nipping at WOTC's heels. It's just not a realistic goal in the current rpg market which is another topic altogether.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Arilyn, post: 7933987, member: 6816042"] I dragged out my 4e books to take a closer look at powers, and yes, while there is lots of shifting, pulling and shoving, there are also a lot of very cool flavourful powers. The monk, for example, is way more interesting than the 5e monk. The game is more fantastical, especially when you add in the other player books. We have characters briefly turning into flights of birds or raining down shards from their bows, at 1st level. I was not a fan of 4e, but taking another look, I think there's a lot there to commend it. Weapon choice is more meaningful. I've always liked the [I]at will, encounter [/I]and [I]daily [/I]idea, as it is nice and obvious when abilities can be used, and you don't have to rely on short rests. As far as the character sheet being too complicated? You don't need a program. It's just going to be a lot of erasing when you level up. You are going to need power cards, however. No way all those abilities will be easily memorized. But, then again, I use them in 5e too (my own, not going to buy them.) The rules books are not immersive, which is odd because of its more fantastical feel at the table. It's not going to fit in with the typical adventures, we imagine in D&D, but if you want to play a game with mighty heroes, heading for fantastic destinies, who'll have a huge impact on the world, 4e is a good choice. As far as PF2 and 4e? The games don't really play the same. PF2 still feels like PF1. There are some similarities to 4e, but not to the extent that Paizo deliberately chose to copy 4e. I'm not happy with character creation, but playing is smooth and a lot of fun. It feels heavy, which can be an initial turn off, but it doesn't actually play heavy. I think it could use some streamlining, in terms of how skills and feats work, and the monster blocks are still a bit too onerous. We can't know how happy Paizo is with this release. 5e is so far ahead in the market that rating PF by comparing it to 5e won't work. Paizo could be doing the best they ever have financially, and there'd be no way to know. Paizo doesn't need to be nipping at WOTC's heels. It's just not a realistic goal in the current rpg market which is another topic altogether. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
Presentation vs design... vs philosophy
Top