Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
Presentation vs design... vs philosophy
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Neonchameleon" data-source="post: 7934391" data-attributes="member: 87792"><p>What feats were those? Because if they existed at all I can't think of any. </p><p></p><p>4e basic attacks were a <em>very specific thing - </em>with specific uses.</p><p></p><p>Meanwhile 3.5 had feats that replaced your basic attack with something better like Manyshot and Whirlwind Attack. Pathfinder doubled down with Vital Strike which took your iterative attacks and replaced them with a single more powerful attack. Pathfinder 2e doing this through a feat is entirely down that path - and through feats like Shield Slam.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Apocalypse World was around to influence it. Fate was around to influence it. Dungeon Crawl Classics was around to influence it. Yet I don't see the claims of ancestry from those. Just because other things exist doesn't mean that they were paid any more than subconscious attention to.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>They made an explicit successor game to Pathfinder 1 using a whole lot of Pathfinder 1 design assumptions and that tried to build on what they were doing with Pathfinder 1. </p><p></p><p></p><p>I disagreed with your assertion about genetics. As I said evolution as a word predates Mendel by 200 years.</p><p></p><p>Pathfinder was a lightly tweaked version of D&D 3.5 - any attempt to say that Pathfinder isn't directly descended from D&D 3.5 is risible.</p><p>Pathfinder 2e is an explicit sequel to Pathfinder 1e.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Can you give examples please? And can you then tell me how they differ from Pathfinder 1's <em>Vital Strike - </em>a core feat which replaces your iterative attacks with one bigger attack. And that is fairly heavily used in the game.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>I found Essentials was a really good set of splatbooks for 4e and there wasn't too much more that could be produced in the current direction.</p><p></p><p>And I have never so far as I am aware said I didn't make a hypothesis - which was then disproved by someone else. A disproven hypothesis is disproven. And something presented as a hypothesis is explicitly something I am uncertain about.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Neonchameleon, post: 7934391, member: 87792"] What feats were those? Because if they existed at all I can't think of any. 4e basic attacks were a [I]very specific thing - [/I]with specific uses. Meanwhile 3.5 had feats that replaced your basic attack with something better like Manyshot and Whirlwind Attack. Pathfinder doubled down with Vital Strike which took your iterative attacks and replaced them with a single more powerful attack. Pathfinder 2e doing this through a feat is entirely down that path - and through feats like Shield Slam. Apocalypse World was around to influence it. Fate was around to influence it. Dungeon Crawl Classics was around to influence it. Yet I don't see the claims of ancestry from those. Just because other things exist doesn't mean that they were paid any more than subconscious attention to. They made an explicit successor game to Pathfinder 1 using a whole lot of Pathfinder 1 design assumptions and that tried to build on what they were doing with Pathfinder 1. I disagreed with your assertion about genetics. As I said evolution as a word predates Mendel by 200 years. Pathfinder was a lightly tweaked version of D&D 3.5 - any attempt to say that Pathfinder isn't directly descended from D&D 3.5 is risible. Pathfinder 2e is an explicit sequel to Pathfinder 1e. Can you give examples please? And can you then tell me how they differ from Pathfinder 1's [I]Vital Strike - [/I]a core feat which replaces your iterative attacks with one bigger attack. And that is fairly heavily used in the game. I found Essentials was a really good set of splatbooks for 4e and there wasn't too much more that could be produced in the current direction. And I have never so far as I am aware said I didn't make a hypothesis - which was then disproved by someone else. A disproven hypothesis is disproven. And something presented as a hypothesis is explicitly something I am uncertain about. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
Presentation vs design... vs philosophy
Top