Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
Presentation vs design... vs philosophy
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Manbearcat" data-source="post: 7934402" data-attributes="member: 6696971"><p>2 first.</p><p></p><p>Premise:</p><p></p><p><strong>"I think there exists a deep similarity between 4E and PF2 as regards design philosophy"</strong></p><p></p><p>If the above premise doesn't bear out a resemblance to "the actual play experience of 4e at the table..."</p><p></p><p>I mean, if these two things aren't roughly equal, then (a) what low bar statement are we trying to tease out of the premise and, more importantly, (b) why is this low bar statement that we're teasing out of the premise even worthy of a post and then apparently controversial enough to stimulate 30 pages of subsequent conversation?</p><p></p><p>Now 1:</p><p></p><p>The burden of proof is on someone making a claim. So, until the proof shows up that there was intentiful design philosophy which endowed a "deep similarity between 4e and PF2", the evidence that 4e advocates who weren't simultaneously PF2 advocates (along with the other aspects of extreme difference that I and others have mentioned) are not playing PF2 is pretty robust.</p><p></p><p>Yes, there are some siloed kindred aspects of the two games. But that is a far cry from the lead post premise.</p><p></p><p>And honestly, I always have to wonder about how this outrage comes to be, in the same way that I wondered how the (truly staggering and embarrassing) scorched earth campaign against 4e came to be (that literally made the hobby uninhabitable...I still contest that the behavior of people during that era drove SIGNIFICANTLY more people away from the hobby than the actual game itself did). It makes no sense. The status quo is never going anywhere. Just because a new game is out doesn't mean that your prior game is gone and iteration is, at its most fundamental level, changing the status quo. If you don't like the changes, you don't have to stage a relentless peasants with torches and pitchforks revolt. Just keep playing what you're playing or play something else (which is what I've always done)!</p><p></p><p>The gatekeeping of TTRPGing (D&D in particular) is easily the worst aspect of our hobby.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Manbearcat, post: 7934402, member: 6696971"] 2 first. Premise: [B]"I think there exists a deep similarity between 4E and PF2 as regards design philosophy"[/B] If the above premise doesn't bear out a resemblance to "the actual play experience of 4e at the table..." I mean, if these two things aren't roughly equal, then (a) what low bar statement are we trying to tease out of the premise and, more importantly, (b) why is this low bar statement that we're teasing out of the premise even worthy of a post and then apparently controversial enough to stimulate 30 pages of subsequent conversation? Now 1: The burden of proof is on someone making a claim. So, until the proof shows up that there was intentiful design philosophy which endowed a "deep similarity between 4e and PF2", the evidence that 4e advocates who weren't simultaneously PF2 advocates (along with the other aspects of extreme difference that I and others have mentioned) are not playing PF2 is pretty robust. Yes, there are some siloed kindred aspects of the two games. But that is a far cry from the lead post premise. And honestly, I always have to wonder about how this outrage comes to be, in the same way that I wondered how the (truly staggering and embarrassing) scorched earth campaign against 4e came to be (that literally made the hobby uninhabitable...I still contest that the behavior of people during that era drove SIGNIFICANTLY more people away from the hobby than the actual game itself did). It makes no sense. The status quo is never going anywhere. Just because a new game is out doesn't mean that your prior game is gone and iteration is, at its most fundamental level, changing the status quo. If you don't like the changes, you don't have to stage a relentless peasants with torches and pitchforks revolt. Just keep playing what you're playing or play something else (which is what I've always done)! The gatekeeping of TTRPGing (D&D in particular) is easily the worst aspect of our hobby. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
Presentation vs design... vs philosophy
Top