Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
Presentation vs design... vs philosophy
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Charlaquin" data-source="post: 7935030" data-attributes="member: 6779196"><p>I’m 100% with you so far.</p><p></p><p></p><p><strong>To you.</strong> And to a lot of other people as well, absolutely. But it is still an opinion, and not one universally held. To many people it did feel like a natural evolution of the game, despite having made many radical changes. I take no issue with people feeling like it was not a natural progression. I only take issue with them stating it as fact instead of opinion.</p><p></p><p></p><p>It isn’t controversial, that’s what I’ve been trying to tell you. It’s fine if it didn’t feel like the previous game to you. What’s not fine is trying to claim that it objectively didn’t feel like the previous game, as if the opinions of the people to whom it felt like a natural progression are somehow wrong.</p><p></p><p></p><p>The thing is, I don’t think you are understanding the basis of our disagreement. It’s hard to agree to disagree on something when it’s not even clear what we’re ostensibly disagreeing on.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Charlaquin, post: 7935030, member: 6779196"] I’m 100% with you so far. [B]To you.[/B] And to a lot of other people as well, absolutely. But it is still an opinion, and not one universally held. To many people it did feel like a natural evolution of the game, despite having made many radical changes. I take no issue with people feeling like it was not a natural progression. I only take issue with them stating it as fact instead of opinion. It isn’t controversial, that’s what I’ve been trying to tell you. It’s fine if it didn’t feel like the previous game to you. What’s not fine is trying to claim that it objectively didn’t feel like the previous game, as if the opinions of the people to whom it felt like a natural progression are somehow wrong. The thing is, I don’t think you are understanding the basis of our disagreement. It’s hard to agree to disagree on something when it’s not even clear what we’re ostensibly disagreeing on. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
Presentation vs design... vs philosophy
Top