Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Dingleberry" data-source="post: 1333556" data-attributes="member: 490">Could you be more specific?&nbsp; Given the odd weapon combination requirement, it doesn't look that out of whack to me when compared to straight fighter levels, for which the bonus feats apply to all weapons rather than the underpowered combination.&nbsp; One successful disarm or running out of ammunition and very few of the abilities are usable anymore.Despite the name, this isn't for vikings.&nbsp; I figured a class devoted to fighting with two weapons didn't need a shield.Agreed, but I think they're necessary (plus they match what the character already has).&nbsp; The BAB requirement is so they don't get access to Improved TWF ridiculously early, and the other shows devotion to each weapon individually, as well as the TWF style.Admittedly, that's behind most of this - but I don't want to make him BETTER than the rest of the party, which is why I'd love more detailed feedback as to why it's unbalanced.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Dingleberry, post: 1333556, member: 490"] Could you be more specific? Given the odd weapon combination requirement, it doesn't look that out of whack to me when compared to straight fighter levels, for which the bonus feats apply to all weapons rather than the underpowered combination. One successful disarm or running out of ammunition and very few of the abilities are usable anymore. Despite the name, this isn't for vikings. I figured a class devoted to fighting with two weapons didn't need a shield. Agreed, but I think they're necessary (plus they match what the character already has). The BAB requirement is so they don't get access to Improved TWF ridiculously early, and the other shows devotion to each weapon individually, as well as the TWF style. Admittedly, that's behind most of this - but I don't want to make him BETTER than the rest of the party, which is why I'd love more detailed feedback as to why it's unbalanced. [/QUOTE]

Verification