Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Patlin" data-source="post: 3359809" data-attributes="member: 17264">Sure, but I think that'd be better flavor text than rules text -- &quot;Paladins rarely become disciples of form because...&quot; sort of thing.&nbsp; My Knight Phantom build violates the heck out of the flavor text in several ways, but that's OK because he's a rare kind of guy anyway. <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile&nbsp; &nbsp; :)"&nbsp; data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" />Not to get too sidetracked, but I've sometimes thought the class designer was a little wonky on the flavor text for Knight Phantoms.&nbsp; The whole bit about being mounted infantry because phantom steeds are too fragile for combat, for example.&nbsp; Has he checked on the stats for nonmagical horses? Plenty of cavalty ride those.&nbsp; And is he taking into account the ability to summon a new steed as a standard action if someone butchers the old one?&nbsp; But I digress....</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Patlin, post: 3359809, member: 17264"] Sure, but I think that'd be better flavor text than rules text -- "Paladins rarely become disciples of form because..." sort of thing. My Knight Phantom build violates the heck out of the flavor text in several ways, but that's OK because he's a rare kind of guy anyway. :) Not to get too sidetracked, but I've sometimes thought the class designer was a little wonky on the flavor text for Knight Phantoms. The whole bit about being mounted infantry because phantom steeds are too fragile for combat, for example. Has he checked on the stats for nonmagical horses? Plenty of cavalty ride those. And is he taking into account the ability to summon a new steed as a standard action if someone butchers the old one? But I digress.... [/QUOTE]

Verification