Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
[Prestige Class] Shadowthorne
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Maximillian" data-source="post: 799274" data-attributes="member: 9471"><p>I have to agree with uv23... This is a list of feats that the character could have otherwise taken, and a significant reduction in sneak attack ability. The player who wants these benefits would get the same number of feats (and some other bonuses) by taking fighter levels intermitantly. </p><p></p><p>Sudden Strike: Not quite as good as Improved Initiative, which could be taken with a fighter bonus feat.</p><p></p><p>Improved two weapon fighting: It's a feat, but it's a significantly powerful feat, awarded without the all requirements being taken... I'm going to presume, however, that anyone working their way into this class will take Two Weapon fighting, since Ambidexterity is sort of worthless otherwise, meaning that this feat could just be gained by taking fighter levels.</p><p></p><p>Deadly Strike: This <em>is</em> sneak attack. Six levels worth. I'll come back to this.</p><p></p><p>Greater Weapon Focus: It's not a feat that can be taken, but taking levels of fighter would give a BAB bonus that would outweigh this bonus in usefulness.</p><p></p><p>Ghost in the Wind: A lovely name for a bunch of skill bonuses. This is the only thing that can't be duplicated with multiclassing.</p><p></p><p>Critical Strike: Another feat that can be gained by multiclassing.</p><p></p><p>Improved Evasion: Something that would be gained with a few more levels of Rogue.</p><p></p><p>So: You have to be a fifth level rogue to gain entrance to this class. Presuming you want this class, you're not giving anything up to get in (You're going to take ambidexterity, if you want to two weapon fight), except Weapon Focus Shortsword (Rogues already have short sword proficiency, so that's a non-issue. Here are two 15th level characters (I'm presuming your class has a rogue BAB):</p><p></p><p>Rogue 5/Shadowthorne 10 (BAB +10)</p><p>Rogue 11/Fighter 4 (BAB +12)</p><p></p><p>The second one can spend his bonus feats on Improved Initiative, Improved Critical(Shortsword) and Improved Two Weapon Fighting. He gets a BAB two points better (better than any benefit he would have gotten from greater weapon focus), better hit points, a slightly better will save, a better fort save (but a worse reflex save), the same sneak attack damage and all martial weapon proficiencies. It's arguable that the Shadowthorne will have better skills (especially hiding and moving silently after those bonuses). The Rogue will also have his choice of 10th level special abilities, rather than being stuck with improved evasion.</p><p></p><p></p><p>So, bottom line, the class you've made has no real flavor. It's not unbalanced, but its prerequisites do not force the character to make interesting choices, and wind up giving him no cool ne abilities that he couldn't have gotten otherwise. Hope this doesn't sound too critical, but I think you were begging for some analysis.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Maximillian, post: 799274, member: 9471"] I have to agree with uv23... This is a list of feats that the character could have otherwise taken, and a significant reduction in sneak attack ability. The player who wants these benefits would get the same number of feats (and some other bonuses) by taking fighter levels intermitantly. Sudden Strike: Not quite as good as Improved Initiative, which could be taken with a fighter bonus feat. Improved two weapon fighting: It's a feat, but it's a significantly powerful feat, awarded without the all requirements being taken... I'm going to presume, however, that anyone working their way into this class will take Two Weapon fighting, since Ambidexterity is sort of worthless otherwise, meaning that this feat could just be gained by taking fighter levels. Deadly Strike: This [i]is[/i] sneak attack. Six levels worth. I'll come back to this. Greater Weapon Focus: It's not a feat that can be taken, but taking levels of fighter would give a BAB bonus that would outweigh this bonus in usefulness. Ghost in the Wind: A lovely name for a bunch of skill bonuses. This is the only thing that can't be duplicated with multiclassing. Critical Strike: Another feat that can be gained by multiclassing. Improved Evasion: Something that would be gained with a few more levels of Rogue. So: You have to be a fifth level rogue to gain entrance to this class. Presuming you want this class, you're not giving anything up to get in (You're going to take ambidexterity, if you want to two weapon fight), except Weapon Focus Shortsword (Rogues already have short sword proficiency, so that's a non-issue. Here are two 15th level characters (I'm presuming your class has a rogue BAB): Rogue 5/Shadowthorne 10 (BAB +10) Rogue 11/Fighter 4 (BAB +12) The second one can spend his bonus feats on Improved Initiative, Improved Critical(Shortsword) and Improved Two Weapon Fighting. He gets a BAB two points better (better than any benefit he would have gotten from greater weapon focus), better hit points, a slightly better will save, a better fort save (but a worse reflex save), the same sneak attack damage and all martial weapon proficiencies. It's arguable that the Shadowthorne will have better skills (especially hiding and moving silently after those bonuses). The Rogue will also have his choice of 10th level special abilities, rather than being stuck with improved evasion. So, bottom line, the class you've made has no real flavor. It's not unbalanced, but its prerequisites do not force the character to make interesting choices, and wind up giving him no cool ne abilities that he couldn't have gotten otherwise. Hope this doesn't sound too critical, but I think you were begging for some analysis. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
[Prestige Class] Shadowthorne
Top