Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
NOW LIVE! Today's the day you meet your new best friend. You don’t have to leave Wolfy behind... In 'Pets & Sidekicks' your companions level up with you!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Prestige Classes - which are broken?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Pax" data-source="post: 1047666" data-attributes="member: 6875"><p>The shorthand? No. The phrase it's shorthand FOR? Absolutely.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Not true. I use shorthand because I type a post <em>about as fast as I woudl be speaking it</em> ... which is why I tend to use boldface and italics for emphasis, instead of colors, fonts, and the like.</p><p></p><p>Now, it's my turn to ask something: do you always jump in and nitpick where it's not needed?</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Personally, while Spellpower was a very attractive component of Archmage, I find several of it's other abilities very interesting too. Mastery of Counterspelling (especially for a sorceror-archmage in an Epic game, with the feat [Epic Counterspell] ...) could prove a lot fo fun. And for a typical blaster-mage, Mastery of Elements and Mastery of Shaping are great abilities (no more worrying about facing red dragins when you're a fire mage ... and no more worries about catching allies in yoru AoEs). Arcane Reach actually has uses, for touch-spell intensive spellcasters.</p><p></p><p>IOW, Archmage (the example at hand) has more speaking for it than the one, abusable ability. My personal fix was, none of the three stacked, and each had the next-lowest one as a prerequisite. *poof* problem solved.</p><p></p><p>And, by the by, to refer back to one of yoru earlier responses: IMO, it's much less "lazy" to <strong>fix</strong> something broken, than just ban it from your game.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Thank you. Tomorrow morning, I think I shall do exactly that (I'd do it now, but I've just responded to him above ...).</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Well, I'm not James, but: I think a PrC shoudl be far and away <strong>better</strong> than a Core class, <em>within the PrC's narrow specialty.</em> IOW, a Lasher should be THE whip-wielder, period, no exceptions.</p><p></p><p><strong>Outside</strong> that narrow specialty, a PrC should be <em>inferior</em> to any core class or combination of core classes. The lasher shouldn't be as good a 2H sword-swinger as a straight fighter (and since the lasher probably lacks the feats to shine with a 2H sword, he presumably is).</p><p></p><p>The concept is, IMO: you have to meet certain prerequisites to enter the PrC; once you've paid the price of admission by going down that specialised road to begin with, it's not unreasonable for you to be rewarded by being a (small) bit <em>extra</em>-good at that specialty.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Pax, post: 1047666, member: 6875"] The shorthand? No. The phrase it's shorthand FOR? Absolutely. Not true. I use shorthand because I type a post [i]about as fast as I woudl be speaking it[/i] ... which is why I tend to use boldface and italics for emphasis, instead of colors, fonts, and the like. Now, it's my turn to ask something: do you always jump in and nitpick where it's not needed? Personally, while Spellpower was a very attractive component of Archmage, I find several of it's other abilities very interesting too. Mastery of Counterspelling (especially for a sorceror-archmage in an Epic game, with the feat [Epic Counterspell] ...) could prove a lot fo fun. And for a typical blaster-mage, Mastery of Elements and Mastery of Shaping are great abilities (no more worrying about facing red dragins when you're a fire mage ... and no more worries about catching allies in yoru AoEs). Arcane Reach actually has uses, for touch-spell intensive spellcasters. IOW, Archmage (the example at hand) has more speaking for it than the one, abusable ability. My personal fix was, none of the three stacked, and each had the next-lowest one as a prerequisite. *poof* problem solved. And, by the by, to refer back to one of yoru earlier responses: IMO, it's much less "lazy" to [b]fix[/b] something broken, than just ban it from your game. Thank you. Tomorrow morning, I think I shall do exactly that (I'd do it now, but I've just responded to him above ...). Well, I'm not James, but: I think a PrC shoudl be far and away [b]better[/b] than a Core class, [i]within the PrC's narrow specialty.[/i] IOW, a Lasher should be THE whip-wielder, period, no exceptions. [b]Outside[/b] that narrow specialty, a PrC should be [i]inferior[/i] to any core class or combination of core classes. The lasher shouldn't be as good a 2H sword-swinger as a straight fighter (and since the lasher probably lacks the feats to shine with a 2H sword, he presumably is). The concept is, IMO: you have to meet certain prerequisites to enter the PrC; once you've paid the price of admission by going down that specialised road to begin with, it's not unreasonable for you to be rewarded by being a (small) bit [i]extra[/i]-good at that specialty. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Prestige Classes - which are broken?
Top