Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Voadam" data-source="post: 1842200" data-attributes="member: 2209">I can understand that critique if you were talking about fighters, barbarians, and rogues, throwing on aristocrats, commoners, warriors, and experts. None of their class definitions are visible aspects. Calling someone a warrior they can be any number of classes to fit that description.However for most of the PC classes there are visible aspects that define the class as such as well as flavor text that defines them.People who can heal with a touch and some who can summon a mount = paladin.Now if the term paladin is used in the game to classify people who fit that criteria it does not seem a stretch for them to be called such by people of that world. Or that if you claim to be one that people expect you can heal with a touch.Ignorant peasants, maybe not. Lawful good church with their own paladins, then yes.If paladins are common and called by a common term then it is not unreasonable to play off the paladin stereotype.</blockquote>