Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Preview: December and Beyond
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Malisteen" data-source="post: 5395763" data-attributes="member: 44380"><p>Words cannot express my disappointment at the Heroes of Shadow preview, but I'll try anyway.</p><p></p><p>I wanted to play a <em>Shadow</em> hero. Not an arcane or divine hero with a hint of shadow flavor. I wanted to play a <em>necromancer</em>, with my character's powers and class features focused on animating and controlling the undead. Not a mage with a sub-par daily summon as an afterthought.</p><p></p><p>When 4e was first being previewed, I loved the concept of Power Sources, and I loved that the more distinct wizard archetypes were going to be spun out into their own classes rather then the wizard being stretched to cover every magical archetype under the sun, and ever magical archetype being crushed to fit under the wizard's mantle. I <em>hate</em> that I'm seeing a return to those days.</p><p></p><p>Of all the power sources, I loved Shadow the most. Shadow has the best fluff - an actual source to the power (the Shadowfell), clearly defined portfolios (darkness, illusion, undead), and an awesome, character defining means of accessing that power (replacing part of your soul with a shard of pure darkness through which you draw shadowstuff from the Shadowfell).</p><p></p><p>I've been waiting for shadow classes since 4e was released, and now the book that should have delivered them instead puts the final nail in their coffin. Thanks to "Heroes of Shadow" there will be no actual Heroes of Shadow in 4th edition, just some lackluster builds of existing classes with purely nominal shadow flavor. If I wanted to re-fluff a summoner wizard I could have done that since Arcane Power. If I wanted to play an evil paladin, I could have just written "E" in my alignment bar since PHBI. I don't need to pay wizards $20 for permission to give existing classes a spooky backstory. I needed actual shadow classes. This book is worse then worthless, because its mere existence means I'll never get any.</p><p></p><p>Ugh. They took the power source with the best fluff and ruined it by reducing it to a sticker to be applied the classes of other power sources.</p><p></p><p>I am <em>beyond</em> disappointed.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Malisteen, post: 5395763, member: 44380"] Words cannot express my disappointment at the Heroes of Shadow preview, but I'll try anyway. I wanted to play a [I]Shadow[/I] hero. Not an arcane or divine hero with a hint of shadow flavor. I wanted to play a [I]necromancer[/I], with my character's powers and class features focused on animating and controlling the undead. Not a mage with a sub-par daily summon as an afterthought. When 4e was first being previewed, I loved the concept of Power Sources, and I loved that the more distinct wizard archetypes were going to be spun out into their own classes rather then the wizard being stretched to cover every magical archetype under the sun, and ever magical archetype being crushed to fit under the wizard's mantle. I [I]hate[/I] that I'm seeing a return to those days. Of all the power sources, I loved Shadow the most. Shadow has the best fluff - an actual source to the power (the Shadowfell), clearly defined portfolios (darkness, illusion, undead), and an awesome, character defining means of accessing that power (replacing part of your soul with a shard of pure darkness through which you draw shadowstuff from the Shadowfell). I've been waiting for shadow classes since 4e was released, and now the book that should have delivered them instead puts the final nail in their coffin. Thanks to "Heroes of Shadow" there will be no actual Heroes of Shadow in 4th edition, just some lackluster builds of existing classes with purely nominal shadow flavor. If I wanted to re-fluff a summoner wizard I could have done that since Arcane Power. If I wanted to play an evil paladin, I could have just written "E" in my alignment bar since PHBI. I don't need to pay wizards $20 for permission to give existing classes a spooky backstory. I needed actual shadow classes. This book is worse then worthless, because its mere existence means I'll never get any. Ugh. They took the power source with the best fluff and ruined it by reducing it to a sticker to be applied the classes of other power sources. I am [I]beyond[/I] disappointed. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Preview: December and Beyond
Top