Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.

Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="jaker2003" data-source="post: 1882522" data-attributes="member: 18667">Why not just give the weapon a Disjunctive ability?  You know, like the Spellgaunt's Disjunctive Bite (Su) [Monster Manual II, page 189].  Perhaps set it up so that other magic items struck by the weapon must succeed on a Will save (DC=10+this ability's CL) or loose their magical abilities (spells, intelligence, etc...).  Creatures (that cast spells or use magic) that are struck must succeed on a Fort save (DC=10+this ability's CL) or be unable to cast spells or use their magical abilities for 1d4 rounds.  Also any spell in effect on the struck creature is subject to a dispel magic effect as if the weapon had cast the spell of the same name.As for deflection, sacred, and profane bonuses, if they are unique to the creature, they were part of the creature's concept, and shouldn't just be pushed aside to kill it easier.  But, if the creature fails its Fort save, it would lose that bonus for 1d4 rounds, just the same <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile    :)"  data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" /> .As for hitting the creature in the first place, there's always the Power Attack feat.  Or I suppose the above mentioned weapon ability could automatically sacrifice the bonus damage from the weapon's enhancement bonus to increase the bonus to the attack roll (+2 Longsword would have a +4 to attack roll and a +0 to damage instead of the normal +2 to attack roll and +2 to damage.  just an idea</blockquote>

Verification